holding that the minimal evidentiary standards of § 6853 were satisfied when the expert identified the standard of care and opined that the medical center deviated from it
Summary of this case from Henry v. FisherNo. 630, 2007.
May 15, 2008.
Appeal from the Superior CA 06C-08-136.
Decisions Without Published Opinions Reversed and Remanded.
holding that the minimal evidentiary standards of § 6853 were satisfied when the expert identified the standard of care and opined that the medical center deviated from it
Summary of this case from Henry v. FisherIn Simmons v. Bayhealth Medical Center, Inc., 950 A.2d 659, 2008 WL 2059891, (Del. May 15, 2008) (TABLE), the Court reversed a Superior Court decision for excluding an expert's testimony.
Summary of this case from Vogel v. DuranFull title:Simmons v. Bayhealth Medical Center, Inc
Court:Supreme Court of Delaware
Date published: May 15, 2008
Although § 6854 does not explicitly address cases in which a physician testifies about non-physicians, both…
Vogel v. DuranNo liability shall be based on asserted negligence unless expert medical testimony is presented as to the…