Summary
requiring a conviction as a prerequisite to application of statutory exclusion "contravenes the legislative purposes of denying coverage for losses resulting from violations of the law and of keeping premiums low"
Summary of this case from Priesman v. Meridian Ins Co.Opinion
Submitted June 17, 1985
Decided September 3, 1985
Motion to dismiss cross appeal taken by respondents-appellants Acampora et al. in Matter of Rech v Acampora granted and cross appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
On the court's own motion, appeals in both actions dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the proceedings within the meaning of the Constitution.
Judge TITONE taking no part.