From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Piazza v. Lakkis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jun 5, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-cv-2130 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 5, 2012)

Summary

finding that a § 1983 claim of unlawful arrest is invalidated by an underlying conviction of a summary offense

Summary of this case from Luna v. Allison

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-cv-2130

06-05-2012

STEPHANIE PIAZZA, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH LAKKIS, Defendant.


(JUDGE CAPUTO)


ORDER

NOW, this 5th day of June, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Joseph Lakkis's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 9) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows:

1. Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment Claims (contained within Counts I, II and III) are DISMISSED;
2. Plaintiff's Fourth Amendment Claim for Malicious Prosecution (Count III) is DISMISSED. However, Plaintiff is given twenty-one (21) days to file an amended complaint solely as to this claim. When submitting such an amended complaint, Plaintiff is directed to follow the procedure for highlighting of amendments outlined in Local Rule 15.1(b).
3. Plaintiff's claims for unlawful arrest under both the Fourth Amendment and under state law (Counts II and VII) are DISMISSED.

The Motion is DENIED in all other respects.

_______________

A. Richard Caputo

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Piazza v. Lakkis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jun 5, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-cv-2130 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 5, 2012)

finding that a § 1983 claim of unlawful arrest is invalidated by an underlying conviction of a summary offense

Summary of this case from Luna v. Allison

finding that a § 1983 claim of unlawful arrest is invalidated by an underlying conviction of a summary offense

Summary of this case from Brogan v. Tunkhannock Twp.

dismissing excessive force claim brought under the Fourteenth Amendment pursuant to the more-specific-provision rule

Summary of this case from Rankin v. Majikes
Case details for

Piazza v. Lakkis

Case Details

Full title:STEPHANIE PIAZZA, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH LAKKIS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jun 5, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-cv-2130 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 5, 2012)

Citing Cases

Simonetti v. Robinson

Kossler v. Crisanti, 564 F.3d 181, 186 (3d Cir. 2009); Piazza v. Lakkis, 2012 WL 2007112, *7 (M.D. Pa.…

Wiggins v. McAndrew

It is well-settled that "[t]o prove malicious prosecution ... a plaintiff must show that: (1) the defendants…