Opinion
February 5, 1996
Appeal from the County Court, Rockland County (Nelson, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant received his agreed-upon sentence, and may not now complain of its excessiveness (see, People v. Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816). The defendant's challenges to the restitution provision of his sentence are unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05) and, in any event, without merit considering that the restitution ordered was a condition of the defendant's plea of guilty (see, e.g., People v. Lugo, 191 A.D.2d 648; People v. Moore, 176 A.D.2d 968; cf, People v. Cisco, 208 A.D.2d 643).
Appellate review of the remaining issue raised by the defendant was effectively waived by him as part of his plea agreement (see, People v. Callahan, 80 N.Y.2d 273; People v. Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1). Rosenblatt, J.P., O'Brien, Pizzuto and Goldstein, JJ., concur.