From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cisco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 11, 1994
208 A.D.2d 643 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

October 11, 1994

Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Goodman, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence that was imposed; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to County Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings consistent herewith.

The plea minutes in this case do not indicate that the defendant agreed to the payment of $22,445.55 restitution as a condition of the sentence. Although a court is, of course, free to reserve the right to order restitution with or without the defendant's consent, the guilty plea in this case was negotiated with terms that did not include restitution. Accordingly, at sentencing, the defendant should have been given an opportunity either to withdraw his plea or to accept the enhanced sentence of restitution and a prison sentence (see, People v. Cowan, 168 A.D.2d 509; People v. Lopez, 135 A.D.2d 739, 739-740). Bracken, J.P., Balletta, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Cisco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 11, 1994
208 A.D.2d 643 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Cisco

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RONALD P. CISCO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 11, 1994

Citations

208 A.D.2d 643 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
618 N.Y.S.2d 239

Citing Cases

State v. Henderson

Although a court is, of course, free to reserve in a plea bargain the right to order restitution, the guilty…

People v. Nichols

Initially, we reject the People's argument that the propriety of the restitution order is not properly before…