From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bushati

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 26, 1998
246 A.D.2d 663 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

January 26, 1998

Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Wexner, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

As the defendant failed to object to the procedure utilized by the court in determining the amount of restitution, his challenge on appeal is not preserved for appellate review ( see, CPL 470.05; People v. Callahan, 80 N.Y.2d 273, 281). In any event, the court did not err in imposing restitution without conducting a hearing. The amount of restitution ordered was a condition of the defendant's plea of guilty ( see, People v. Brown, 224 A.D.2d 437, 438), and the defendant agreed to the amount at the plea allocution ( see, People v. Ali, 233 A.D.2d 517).

The defendant's remaining contention, that his sentence was otherwise excessive, is without merit, as he was sentenced in accordance with the plea agreement ( see, People v. Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816).

Mangano, P.J., Copertino, Joy, Florio and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Bushati

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 26, 1998
246 A.D.2d 663 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Bushati

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FLORJAN BUSHATI…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 26, 1998

Citations

246 A.D.2d 663 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
666 N.Y.S.2d 953

Citing Cases

People v. Vazqueztell

05; People v. Callahan, 80 N.Y.2d 273, 281). In any event, since the defendant agreed at his plea allocution…

People v. Hannan

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant's challenges to the adequacy of the procedure utilized…