Summary
holding that "while [the SDM] was not a doctor, his opinion was subsequently concurred in by someone who is" and thus reversal was not warranted
Summary of this case from Martin v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.Opinion
Case No. 5:10-cv-5-Oc-10TGW.
May 10, 2011
ORDER
The United States Magistrate Judge has issued a Report (Doc. 23) recommending that the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security denying the Plaintiff's application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income benefits be affirmed. The Plaintiff has not objected to the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and the time for objecting has elapsed.
Upon an independent examination of the file and upon due consideration, the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 23) is adopted, confirmed and made a part hereof, and the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED.
The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly, terminate any pending motions, and close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DONE and ORDERED at Ocala, Florida.