recognizing Cooper as the controlling authority in NIED claims resulting from property damage
Summary of this case from Ash v. Bank of America N.A.92-70701.
April 5, 1994.
Appeal from N.L.R.B.
DISMISSED.
recognizing Cooper as the controlling authority in NIED claims resulting from property damage
Summary of this case from Ash v. Bank of America N.A.In Nicolescu v Faith & Freedom Coalition (21 F3d 1114 [Table] [9th Cir. 1994]), pro se plaintiffs sued various defendants, including the Romanian Communist Party, Pope John Paul II, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, the Roman Catholic Church, the Los Angeles Police Department and the publicist Howard Rubenstein for numerous alleged illegal acts.
Summary of this case from Campbell v. Barclays Bank PLC, 2009 NY Slip Op 51417(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 7/2/2009)In Nicolescu v Faith Freedom Coalition (21 F3d 1114 [Table] [9th Cir. 1994]), pro se plaintiffs sued various defendants, including the Romanian Communist Party, Pope John Paul II, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, the Roman Catholic Church, the Los Angeles Police Department and the publicist Howard Rubenstein for numerous alleged illegal acts.
Summary of this case from Campbell v. Barclays Bank PLCFull title:N.L.R.B. v. National Research Group, Inc
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Date published: Apr 5, 1994
The allegations in the SAC regarding Plaintiffs' Fourteenth Amendment claim do not sufficiently put the…
Pace Ind. UNION-MGMT.T Pension v. Clarke ManufacturingUpon review, the controlling question here is a legal issue, of whether under the LRMA, a bargaining party…