From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Molotky v. Wells Fargo Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Apr 13, 2018
No. 1:15-cv-769 (W.D. Mich. Apr. 13, 2018)

Opinion

No. 1:15-cv-769

04-13-2018

GRETCHEN MOLOTKY, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and TROTT LAW, PC, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

All pending claims have been resolved. As required by Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, JUDGMENT ENTERS.

THIS ACTION IS TERMINATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: April 13, 2018

/s/ Paul L. Maloney

Paul L. Maloney

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Molotky v. Wells Fargo Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Apr 13, 2018
No. 1:15-cv-769 (W.D. Mich. Apr. 13, 2018)
Case details for

Molotky v. Wells Fargo Bank

Case Details

Full title:GRETCHEN MOLOTKY, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., U.S. BANK NATIONAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 13, 2018

Citations

No. 1:15-cv-769 (W.D. Mich. Apr. 13, 2018)

Citing Cases

Halliday v. Fraser

"To establish a claim for fraud under Michigan law, the plaintiff must show six elements: (1) the defendant…

Fuller v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.

Under Michigan law, "[f]uture promises cannot form the basis for a fraud claim." Molotky v. Wells Fargo Bank,…