From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McAleny v. Max J. Kuney Co.

Oregon Supreme Court
Feb 8, 2001
16 P.3d 1154 (Or. 2001)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In Mctaggart, the court concluded the employer exercised such control over a slope outside its premises that the parking lot rule should be extended to encompass the slope as well.

Summary of this case from Samuel v. Cox Commc'ns
See 1 Summary

Opinion

(WCB 95-09821; CA A95113; SC S44443)

Filed: February 8, 2001

On petition for review filed August 11, 1997.

Judicial review from the Workers' Compensation Board; 149 Or. App. 212, 942 P.2d 302 (1997).

Brad Larsen, Portland, filed the petition for petitioner on review.

No appearance contra.

Before Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Durham, Leeson, and Riggs, Justices.

Van Hoomissen, J., retired December 31, 2000, and did not participate in the decision of this case. Kulongoski and De Muniz, JJ., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated. The case is remanded to the Workers' Compensation Board for further proceedings in light of this court's decision in Robinson v. Nabisco, Inc, 331 Or. 178, 11 P.3d 1286 (2000).

Summaries of

McAleny v. Max J. Kuney Co.

Oregon Supreme Court
Feb 8, 2001
16 P.3d 1154 (Or. 2001)

In Mctaggart, the court concluded the employer exercised such control over a slope outside its premises that the parking lot rule should be extended to encompass the slope as well.

Summary of this case from Samuel v. Cox Commc'ns
Case details for

McAleny v. Max J. Kuney Co.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Compensation of Rodney G. McAleny, Claimant. RODNEY…

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Feb 8, 2001

Citations

16 P.3d 1154 (Or. 2001)
16 P.3d 1154

Citing Cases

In re Compensation of Mcaleny

Claimant sought Supreme Court review and, while the review was pending, the court decided in Robinson that an…

Samuel v. Cox Commc'ns

Therefore, this exception does not apply. Finally, Samuel relies on McTaggart v. Time Warner Cable, 16 P.3d…

2 Citing Cases