From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Langrill v. Lounge

Supreme Court of Michigan
Nov 29, 2004
471 Mich. 926 (Mich. 2004)

Opinion

No. 126327.

November 29, 2004.


SC: 126327.

Summary Dispositions.

In lieu of granting leave to appeal, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the matter is remanded to the Macomb Circuit Court for further proceedings. Because plaintiff did not present any evidence to the contrary, there is a presumption that the attorney-client relationship she entered into with her first attorney, who filed the original complaint in this matter, included the purpose of pursuing a claim under MCL 436.1801. MCR 7.302(G)(1). Chambers v Midland Country Club, 215 Mich App 573 (1996). On remand, the circuit court shall find whether sufficient information for determining that defendant might be liable under MCL 436.1801 was not known and could not reasonably have been known within 120 days of the beginning of that first attorney-client relationship. The circuit court shall grant defendant's motion for summary disposition under the 120-day notice rule if, and only if, the court finds that this information was known or could reasonably have been known during that 120-day period. Jurisdiction is not retained. Reported below: 261 Mich App 698.

CAVANAGH and KELLY, JJ. We concur in remanding this case to the Macomb Circuit Court.


Summaries of

Langrill v. Lounge

Supreme Court of Michigan
Nov 29, 2004
471 Mich. 926 (Mich. 2004)
Case details for

Langrill v. Lounge

Case Details

Full title:LANGRILL v. STINGERS LOUNGE

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Nov 29, 2004

Citations

471 Mich. 926 (Mich. 2004)
689 N.W.2d 228

Citing Cases

Dakaj v. Deters

See id. See also Langrill v Stingers Lounge, 471 Mich. 926 (2004) (remanding for the trial court to…

Sanders v. Tumbleweed Saloon, Inc.

MCL 436.1801(4). See Langrill v. Stingers Lounge , 471 Mich. 926, 926, 689 N.W.2d 228 (2004) ("Because…