From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Upstate Recreation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION
Feb 18, 2015
Civil Action No. 6:13-2467-TMC (D.S.C. Feb. 18, 2015)

Summary

awarding two-and-one-half times the statutory award in enhanced damages

Summary of this case from Joe Hand Promotions Inc. v. Nichols

Opinion

Civil Action No. 6:13-2467-TMC

02-18-2015

Joe Hand Promotions, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Upstate Recreation d/b/a Leeg's Nightclub and Chris Ruegsegger, Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, Joe Hand Promotions, Inc., filed this action asserting claims under the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 605, and the Cable Communications Policy Act, 47 U.S.C. § 553, as well as a state law claim for conversation. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Civil Rule 73.02, D.S.C., this matter was referred to a magistrate judge for pretrial handling. Before the court is the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation ("Report"), recommending that Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment against Defendant Chris Ruegsegger (ECF No. 37) be granted; Plaintiff's motion for default judgment against Defendant Upstate Recreation, d/b/a Leeg's Nightclub (ECF No. 40) be granted; and that the motion to dismiss filed by Defendant Chris Ruegsegger (ECF No. 42) be denied. (ECF No. 61). The Report further recommended the award of statutory or actual damages and attorney fees as set forth below, and required Plaintiff to elect between recovery on the statutory claim or the conversion claim. Plaintiff filed a declaration indicating that it seeks recovery on the statutory claim and not the conversion claim. (ECF No. 65). The parties were advised of their right to file objections to the Report. (ECF No. 61-1). However, no objections have been filed, and the time to do so has now run.

The Report has no presumptive weight and the responsibility to make a final determination in this matter remains with this court. See Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 27071 (1976). In the absence of objections, this court is not required to provide an explanation for adopting the Report. See Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983). Rather, "in the absence of a timely filed objection, a district court need not conduct a de novo review, but instead must only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation." Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 advisory committee's note).

After a thorough review of the Report and the record in this case, the court adopts the magistrate judge's Report (ECF No. 61) and incorporates it herein. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment against Defendant Chris Ruegsegger (ECF No. 37) is GRANTED; that Plaintiff's motion for default judgment against Defendant Upstate Recreation d/b/a Leeg's Nightclub (ECF No. 40) is GRANTED; and that the motion to dismiss filed Defendant Chris Ruegsegger (ECF No. 42) is DENIED.

It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff be awarded (1) statutory damages in the amount of $10,000, enhanced damages in the amount of $25,000, and attorneys' fees and costs in the amount of $2,757.50, for a total award of $37,757.50 on its claim under 47 U.S.C. § 605. It is further ORDERED that Defendants be jointly and severally liable for the damage award elected by Plaintiff.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Timothy M. Cain

United States District Judge
February 18, 2015
Anderson, South Carolina

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL

The parties are hereby notified of the right to appeal this order pursuant to Rules 3 and 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.


Summaries of

Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Upstate Recreation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION
Feb 18, 2015
Civil Action No. 6:13-2467-TMC (D.S.C. Feb. 18, 2015)

awarding two-and-one-half times the statutory award in enhanced damages

Summary of this case from Joe Hand Promotions Inc. v. Nichols

awarding two-and-one-half times the statutory award in enhanced damages

Summary of this case from Joe Hand Promotions Inc. v. Harrison

awarding as enhanced damages 2.5 times the statutory damages and citing cases awarding three times and two times the statutory awards

Summary of this case from Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Lawhon
Case details for

Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Upstate Recreation

Case Details

Full title:Joe Hand Promotions, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Upstate Recreation d/b/a Leeg's…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Feb 18, 2015

Citations

Civil Action No. 6:13-2467-TMC (D.S.C. Feb. 18, 2015)

Citing Cases

Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Rest. 54

To establish vicarious liability under the Communications Act, a plaintiff need only show that the individual…

Joe Hand Promotions Inc. v. Nichols

Enhanced penalties often bear a relation to the amount of the statutory award. See, e.g., Lawhon, 2016 WL…