From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garmon v. Hagans

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.
Dec 17, 2013
753 S.E.2d 744 (N.C. Ct. App. 2013)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

holding the trial court properly denied plaintiff’s motions for directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict regarding contributory negligence where there was evidence of defendant’s intoxication and defendant acknowledged "he had drunk enough to affect his driving"

Summary of this case from Brubach v. Peterson
See 1 Summary

Opinion

No. COA13–441.

2013-12-17

Terry GARMON, Plaintiff, v. Todd Clayton HAGANS, Defendant.

Doran, Shelby, Pethel and Hudson, P.A., by Michael Doran, for plaintiff. Vernis & Bowling of Charlotte, PLLC, by R. Gregory Lewis, for defendant.

McCULLOUGH

Summaries of

Garmon v. Hagans

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.
Dec 17, 2013
753 S.E.2d 744 (N.C. Ct. App. 2013)

holding the trial court properly denied plaintiff’s motions for directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict regarding contributory negligence where there was evidence of defendant’s intoxication and defendant acknowledged "he had drunk enough to affect his driving"

Summary of this case from Brubach v. Peterson
Case details for

Garmon v. Hagans

Case Details

Full title:Terry GARMON, Plaintiff, v. Todd Clayton HAGANS, Defendant.

Court:Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Date published: Dec 17, 2013

Citations

753 S.E.2d 744 (N.C. Ct. App. 2013)

Citing Cases

Brubach v. Peterson

See Green v. Rouse , 116 N.C. App. 647, 651, 448 S.E.2d 846, 848 (1994) (holding the trial court properly…

1 Citing Cases