Summary
adopting the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommendations in Doe v. Sorsai, No. 3:12-0065, 2012 WL 2954107 (S.D. W. Va. June 18, 2012)
Summary of this case from Durstein v. AlexanderOpinion
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-0065
07-19-2012
JOHN DOE, Plaintiff, v. MARK A. SORSAI, PUTNAM COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, SHERRI D. GOODMAN, W.V. DEPARTEMENT OF EDUCATION, Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
This action was referred to the Honorable Cheryl A. Eifert, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The Magistrate Judge has submitted findings of fact and recommended that Defendants' Motions to Dismiss be granted (Doc. #s 12, 25, 30, and 52) and Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. #1) be dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim. Neither party has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's findings and recommendation.
Accordingly, the Court accepts and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and ORDERS that Defendants' Motions to Dismiss be GRANTED (Doc. #s 12, 25, 30, and 52) and Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. #1) be DISMISSED, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim, consistent with the findings and recommendation.
The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to forward copies of this written opinion and order to all counsel of record, and any unrepresented parties.
_______________
ROBERT C. CHAMBERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE