From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

C.P. v. Krum Indep. Sch. Dist.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Sep 17, 2014
CASE NO. 4:13cv63 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 17, 2014)

Summary

holding that a school district's full evaluation of plaintiff, including an evaluation for autism spectrum disorder, shortly after suspecting plaintiff had a disability was "sufficient to satisfy [the school district's] Child Find obligations."

Summary of this case from Through Her Next Friend, Tracey K. v. Lewisville Indep. Sch. Dist.

Opinion

CASE NO. 4:13cv63

09-17-2014

C.P., and her parent and next friend, L.N., Plaintiff, v. KRUM INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant.


**NOT FOR PRINTED PUBLICATION**

Judge Clark/Judge Mazzant ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On August 6, 2014, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant Krum Independent School District's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record [Doc. #27] be granted, Plaintiffs' Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record [Doc. #32] be denied, and Krum Independent School District's Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff's Response to the District's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record [Doc. #35] be denied.

Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the court.

It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant Krum Independent School District's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record [Doc. #27] is GRANTED, Plaintiffs' Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record [Doc. #32] is DENIED, and Krum Independent School District's Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff's Response to the District's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record [Doc. #35] is DENIED.

The court further ORDERS that this case is dismissed with prejudice.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 17 day of September, 2014.

/s/_________

Ron Clark, United States District Judge


Summaries of

C.P. v. Krum Indep. Sch. Dist.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Sep 17, 2014
CASE NO. 4:13cv63 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 17, 2014)

holding that a school district's full evaluation of plaintiff, including an evaluation for autism spectrum disorder, shortly after suspecting plaintiff had a disability was "sufficient to satisfy [the school district's] Child Find obligations."

Summary of this case from Through Her Next Friend, Tracey K. v. Lewisville Indep. Sch. Dist.
Case details for

C.P. v. Krum Indep. Sch. Dist.

Case Details

Full title:C.P., and her parent and next friend, L.N., Plaintiff, v. KRUM INDEPENDENT…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 17, 2014

Citations

CASE NO. 4:13cv63 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 17, 2014)

Citing Cases

Through Her Next Friend, Tracey K. v. Lewisville Indep. Sch. Dist.

On the contrary, the multiple evaluations demonstrate that the LISD complied with these obligations. See C.P.…

Devon L. v. Clear Creek Indep. Sch. Dist.

Only if the local educational agency had reason to suspect both a disability and the need for special…