From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boyd v. University Maryland Med. System

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 25, 1998
162 F.3d 1154 (4th Cir. 1998)

Summary

finding that employer's stated reason for reorganizing — a desire to conserve resources and create more efficient bureaucracy, was a sufficient, nondiscriminatory reason

Summary of this case from Perry v. Computer Sciences Corporation

Opinion

No. 98-1393.

August 25, 1998.

Appeal Dismissed. D.Md.


DECISIONS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS


Summaries of

Boyd v. University Maryland Med. System

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 25, 1998
162 F.3d 1154 (4th Cir. 1998)

finding that employer's stated reason for reorganizing — a desire to conserve resources and create more efficient bureaucracy, was a sufficient, nondiscriminatory reason

Summary of this case from Perry v. Computer Sciences Corporation

affirming dismissal of complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction where plaintiff bringing discrimination suit was unable to demonstrate that defendant businesses were recipients of federal funds and no federal question was present

Summary of this case from Appling v. Alleghany Cnty.
Case details for

Boyd v. University Maryland Med. System

Case Details

Full title:Boyd v. University of Maryland Medical System Corp

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Aug 25, 1998

Citations

162 F.3d 1154 (4th Cir. 1998)

Citing Cases

McKinney v. Colvin

See Swaim v. Califano, 599 F.2d 1309 (4th Cir. 1979); Importantly, an ALJ does not make a finding of fact by…

Watts v. Kijakazi

The hypothetical questions presented to the VE are not factual findings and do not bind the ALJ just because…