Opinion
2011 CA 1784R
08-18-2014
Robert R. Rainer Drew M. Talbot Frederick Mulhearn Baton Rouge, Louisiana Attorneys for Plaintiff/Appellee The Ascension Parish Sales and Use Tax Authority Jesse R. Adams, III Andre B. Burvant Kathryn S. Friel Matthew A. Mantle New Orleans, Louisiana Attorneys for Defendant/Appellant Louisiana Machinery Rentals, L.L.C.
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA APPEALED FROM THE TWENTY-THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE PARISH OF ASCENSION STATE OF LOUISIANA
DOCKET NUMBER 98120
DIVISION "A" HONORABLE RALPH TUREAU, JUDGE Robert R. Rainer
Drew M. Talbot
Frederick Mulhearn
Baton Rouge, Louisiana Attorneys for Plaintiff/Appellee
The Ascension Parish Sales and Use
Tax Authority Jesse R. Adams, III
Andre B. Burvant
Kathryn S. Friel
Matthew A. Mantle
New Orleans, Louisiana Attorneys for Defendant/Appellant
Louisiana Machinery Rentals, L.L.C. BEFORE: McDONALD, HIGGINBOTHAM, DRAKE, JJ. McDONALD, J.
Pursuant to a writ of certiorari granted on January 17, 2014, by the Louisiana Supreme Court, this case was remanded to this court with instructions to consider the matter in light of the recent opinions of Washington Parish Sheriff's Office v. Louisiana Machinery Co., LLC, 13-0583 (La. 10/15/13), 126 So.3d 1273, and Catahoula Parish School Bd. v. Louisiana Machinery Co., LLC, 12-2504 (La. 10/15/13), 124 So.3d 1065.
In Catahoula Parish School Bd., the supreme court affirmed the third circuit's reversal of the trial court's grant of a partial summary judgment in favor of the Catahoula Parish School Board and the Catahoula Parish Police Jury, specifically ruling that the mandatory notice requirements of La. R.S. 47:337.51 were deficient and, therefore, not final; that the validity of the notices of assessments constituted an essential element of the tax collectors' claims rather than strictly a defense asserted by the companies; and that the defenses of the companies were timely filed. 124 So.3d at 1076. In Washington Parish Sheriff's Office, the supreme court reversed this court's decision for the reasons it had assigned in Catahoula Parish School Bd., 126 So.3d at 1279.
Subsequent to the supreme court's remand, the Ascension Parish Sales and Use Tax Authority (the Tax Collector) and Louisiana Machinery Rentals, L.L.C. (the Company) filed a joint motion requesting specified relief. Based on our review of the Louisiana Supreme Court's holdings in Catahoula Parish School Bd. and Washington Parish Sheriff's Office, we grant relief. Thus, our earlier judgment, Ascension Parish Sales and Use Tax Authority v. Louisiana Machinery Rentals, Inc., 11-1784 (La. App. 1st Cir. 3/30/12), 92 So.3d 404, is vacated in its entirety.
We affirm that portion of the trial court judgment that vacated its March 2, 2011 judgment. We reverse that portion of the trial court judgment that granted partial summary judgment in favor of the Tax Collector, since the Tax Collector's notice of assessments under La. R.S. 47:337.51 was deficient and, therefore, not final; and because that sufficiency notice was an essential element of its claim, the Tax Collector failed its burden of proving entitlement to the taxes it averred were due. We reverse that portion of the trial court judgment that granted the Tax Collector's peremptory exception of lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter and the exception is denied. We vacate the dismissal of the Company's exceptions, affirmative defenses and denials. We affirm that portion of the trial court judgment that denied the Tax Collector's motion to strike the Company's supplemental and amended exceptions and incorporated memorandum, affirmative defenses, and answer. We vacate that portion of the trial court judgment that assessed costs against the company, with costs to be determined by the trial court in future proceedings. The matter is remanded for further proceedings. Appeal costs in the amount of $2,415.75 are assessed one-half against the Ascension Parish Sales and Use Tax Authority and one-half against Louisiana Machinery Rentals, LLC.
JOINT MOTION GRANTED IN PART; MARCH 30, 2012 JUDGMENT VACATED; TRIAL COURT JUDGMENT AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND VACATED IN PART; MATTER REMANDED.