The county auditor shall reduce levies for any excess of levies over levy limitations pursuant to section 275.16. Such reduction in excess levies may, at the discretion of the school district, be spread over two calendar years.
By October 7 of each year each district must notify the commissioner of the proposed levies in compliance with the levy limitations of this chapter and chapters 120B, 122A, 123A, 123B, 124D, 125A, 127A, and 136D. A school district that has reached an agreement with its home county auditor to extend the date of certification of its proposed levy under section 275.065, subdivision 1, must submit its notice of proposed levies to the commissioner no later than October 10 of each year. By January 7 of each year each district must notify the commissioner of the final levies certified. The commissioner shall prescribe the form of these notifications and may request any additional information necessary to compute certified levy amounts.
If any district levy is found to be excessive as a result of a decision of the Tax Court or a redetermination by the commissioner of revenue under section 127A.48, subdivisions 7 to 16, or for any other reason, the amount of the excess shall be deducted from the levy certified in the next year for the same purpose. If no levy is certified in the next year for the same purpose or if the amount certified is less than the amount of the excess, the excess must be deducted from that levy and the general fund levy certified pursuant to chapters 122A, 123A, 123B, 124D, and 126C. If the amount of any aid would have been increased in a prior year as a result of a decision of the Tax Court or a redetermination by the commissioner of revenue, the amount of the increase shall be added to the amount of current aid for the same purposes.
Notwithstanding any other charter provision, general or special laws to the contrary, every school district in the state shall abide by the terms and provisions of this section and chapters 120B, 122A, 123A, 123B, 124D, 125A, 126C, and 127A.
The computation of levy limitations pursuant to this chapter and chapters 120B, 122A, 123A, 123B, 124D, 125A, 127A, 136C, and 136D shall be based on estimates where necessary. If as a result of using estimates for these computations the amount of any levy is different from the amount which could actually have been levied if actual data had been available, levy limitations in the first year when the actual data is known shall be adjusted to reflect for this difference. The amount of any adjustment to levy limitations pursuant to this subdivision shall be recognized as revenue in the school year when the levy for which the levy limitation is so adjusted is recognized as revenue.
Whenever a change enacted in law changes the levy authority for a school district or an intermediate school district for a fiscal year after the levy for that fiscal year has been certified by the district under section 275.07, the department must adjust the next levy certified by the district by the amount of the change in levy authority for that fiscal year resulting from the change. Notwithstanding section 123B.75, the entire amount of the levy adjustment must be recognized as revenue in the fiscal year the levy is certified, if sufficient levy resources are available under generally accepted accounting principles in the district fund where the adjustment is to occur. Districts that do not have sufficient levy resources available in the fund where the adjustment is to occur must recognize in the fiscal year the levy is certified an amount equal to the levy resources available. The remaining adjustment amount must be recognized as revenue in the fiscal year after the levy is certified.
For each tax settlement, the county auditor shall report to each school district by fund, the district tax settlement revenue defined in section 123B.75, subdivision 1a, on the form specified in section 276.10. The county auditor shall send to the district a copy of the spread levy report specified in section 275.124.
Minn. Stat. § 126C.48
Ex1971 c 31 art 20 s 8; 1973 c 683 s 19; 1975 c 432 s 75,78,80,81; 1976 c 2 s 97; 1976 c 271 s 87,90; 1977 c 447 art 1 s 20; 1978 c 764 s 106,109,111; 1979 c 334 art 1 s 22,24; art 2 s 13; 1980 c 509 s 112; 1980 c 607 art 7 s 9; 1980 c 609 art 1 s 13; art 4 s 16; 1981 c 358 art 1 s 39,42; 1986 c 441 s 1; 1986 c 444; 1Sp1986 c 1 art 4 s 27; 1Sp1986 c 3 art 2 s 36; 1987 c 268 art 7 s 41, 43; art 9 s 8; 1987 c 398 art 7 s 39; 1Sp1987 c 4 art 1 s 5; 1988 c 486 s 87, 89; 1988 c 719 art 5 s 84; 1989 c 222 s 35; 1989 c 329 art 13 s 13, 20; 1Sp1989 c 1 art 2 s 11; art 6 s 10,11; 1990 c 604 art 3 s 29; 1991 c 130 s 31, 32; 1992 c 499 art 12 s 25, 29; 1992 c 511 art 3 s 8; 1995 c 212 art 4 s 64; 1995 c 264 art 3 s 1, 2; 1Sp1995 c 3 art 1 s 18, 19; art 16 s 13; 1996 c 412 art 1 s 12; 1997 c 7 art 1 s 64; 1997 c 251 s 18; 1Sp1997 c 4 art 1 s 32; 1998 c 389 art 10 s 1; 1998 c 397 art 7 s 117-122; art 11 s 3; 1999 c 86 art 1 s 35; 2000 c 254 s 45, 46; 1Sp2001 c 5 art 6 s 3; 2002 c 377 art 8 s 2; 1Sp2003 c 9 art 5 s 13; 2004 c 228 art 3 s 1; 1Sp2005 c 5 art 1 s 38, 39; 2007 c 146 art 5 s 8; art 11 s 17; 1Sp2010 c 1 art 3 s 4; 2013 c 143 art 11 s 1; art 14 s 110; 2014 c 312 art 18 s 14; 1Sp2015 c 3 art 1 s 14; 2016 c 189 art 30 s 20