HRS § 704-407
COMMENTARY ON § 704-407
This section affords the defendant and the defendant's counsel the opportunity, notwithstanding the defendant's unfitness to proceed, to make any objection to the prosecution which is susceptible of a fair determination without the personal participation of the defendant. It seems clear that this is an eminently sensible provision in view of the fact that it is the defendant's inability to participate in the defendant's defense (either because the defendant lacks capacity to either understand the proceedings or to assist in the defendant's own defense) that has rendered the defendant unfit to be proceeded against. If a valid objection to the continuance of the prosecution can be established without the participation of the defendant, there is no reason not to terminate it.
This section is an addition to the law. The concept was originally proposed by the Massachusetts Judicial Council[1] and adopted as an optional alternative by the Model Penal Code.[2]
SUPPLEMENTAL COMMENTARY ON § 704-407
Act 222, Session Laws 1980, eliminated post-commitment release motions based upon factual grounds and limited such motions to those based upon legal grounds. The intent was to have all factual issues, including insanity, heard in one trial.
Act 230, Session Laws 2006, amended this section to, among other things, allow the court to order the release of the defendant on conditions, subject to the law governing involuntary outpatient treatment.
__________
§ 704-407 Commentary:
1. Massachusetts Judicial Council, Thirty-Sixth Report 22-24, 27-28 (1960).
2. M.P.C. §4.06. The other alternative is to limit post-commitment hearings to legal objections to the prosecution which are susceptible of a determination prior to trial.