Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-215b
(P.A. 89-203, S. 2, 3; P.A. 91-391, S. 8; June 18 Sp. Sess. P.A. 97-1, S. 66, 75; P.A. 03-130, S. 1; P.A. 04-76, S. 39; P.A. 06-149, S. 18; P.A. 11-214, S. 21.)
Cited. 218 Conn. 467; 219 Conn. 703; 222 Conn. 699; 231 C. 1; 236 Conn. 582. Cited. 25 Conn.App. 555; Id., 563; Id., 595; 26 CA 617; 27 Conn.App. 724; 29 Conn.App. 368; Id., 436; 31 Conn.App. 761; 37 Conn.App. 856; 39 Conn.App. 258; 40 Conn.App. 570. Determination of child support arrearage payments must be made in accordance with child support and arrearage guidelines. 70 Conn.App. 212. Defendant's failure to file worksheet pursuant to child support guidelines precludes claim that court did not adhere to such guidelines. 79 Conn.App. 783; overruled, see 308 C. 194. Trial court erred when it deviated from the presumptive health care coverage contribution without a specific finding on the record that application of the guidelines would have been inequitable or inappropriate under the circumstances. 97 Conn.App. 122. Court violates provisions of section by failing to articulate its reasons for deviating from the child support guidelines. 127 Conn.App. 417; judgment affirmed, see 308 Conn. 194. Child support guidelines must be considered in any marital dissolution action involving minor children, and there is no exception to this mandate for unallocated awards of alimony and child support. 138 CA 544. Subsec. (a): Trial court abused its discretion by failing to calculate a presumptive child support amount, thereby failing to determine that a presumptive support amount was inequitable or inappropriate, and thereafter finding that a deviation from the child support guidelines was warranted. 299 C. 308. Cited. 25 Conn.App. 693; 28 Conn.App. 208; Id., 632; 41 Conn.App. 163; 45 Conn.App. 737. Court not required to make specific finding on the record that application of child support guidelines would be inequitable or inappropriate when it rendered dissolution decree incorporating the agreement of the parties. 56 Conn.App. 459. Trial court's failure to make specific findings on the record concerning the presumptively correct child support guideline arrearage figure and reasons why such figure was inequitable or inappropriate constituted reversible error. 67 CA 527.