Conn. Gen. Stat. § 35-42
(1971, P.A. 608, S. 19; P.A. 73-668, S. 3, 4; P.A. 75-508, S. 3, 7; 75-567, S. 13, 80; P.A. 78-280, S. 6, 127; P.A. 88-230, S. 1, 12; P.A. 90-98, S. 1, 2; P.A. 93-142 , S. 4 , 7 , 8 ; P.A. 95-220 , S. 4 -6; P.A. 09-68 , S. 1 ; P.A. 13-85 , S. 1 .)
Cited. 169 Conn. 344 . Not proper for court to make determination as to substantive applicability of antitrust act upon application for order of compliance with subpoena under section. 179 Conn. 324 . Cited. 190 C. 510 ; 212 Conn. 661 . Future court is not bound by trial court's rejection of plaintiff's interpretation of confidentiality provisions of section, as decision was interlocutory. 288 C. 646 . Section bars disclosure of material and information gathered in antitrust investigation under section to all persons outside Attorney General's office, with the exception of officials of other states and the federal government, provided Attorney General first obtains agreements from such officials that they will abide by the same confidentiality restrictions to which Attorney General is subject. 297 C. 710 . Subpoena duces tecum: Issuance equals reasonable belief of violation, not criminal in nature, not to be fishing expedition, evidence produced by, confidential. 30 Conn.Supp. 87 . Constitutionality upheld. 32 CS 198.