Conn. Gen. Stat. § 30-63
(1949 Rev., S. 4306; 1953, S. 2171d; P.A. 73-535; P.A. 74-19, S. 1, 2; P.A. 77-438, S. 4; 77-614, S. 165, 587, 610; P.A. 78-303, S. 80, 85, 136; P.A. 80-482, S. 4, 170, 191, 345, 348; P.A. 81-294, S. 10, 22; P.A. 82-238, S. 1, 2; 82-330, S. 1, 4; P.A. 84-332, S. 1; P.A. 91-122 ; May 25 Sp. Sess. P.A. 94-1 , S. 59 , 130; P.A. 95-195 , S. 66 , 83 ; June 30 Sp. Sess. P.A. 03-6, S. 146 (d); P.A. 04-169 , S. 17 ; 04-189 , S. 1 ; P.A. 05-240 , S. 1 ; P.A. 06-26 , S. 1 ; 06-30 , S. 1 ; P.A. 07-198 , S. 1 ; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 09-3 , S. 367 ; P.A. 17-90 , S. 2 .)
Cited. 130 Conn. 374 . If sales of liquor were in violation of a zoning ordinance, any party whose interests were injured would in a proper case be entitled to seek redress by injunction. 133 Conn. 156 . Commission is endowed with discretion in approving or disapproving of brand, trade name, etc. Id., 349. In seeking order requiring commission to approve brand, plaintiff was in the untenable position of seeking relief under a statute it claimed was unconstitutional. Id., 350. Cited. Id., 604. Constitutionality upheld; not essential that permittee or backer have actual knowledge of allowance. 140 C. 185. Cited. 194 Conn. 165 ; 213 Conn. 184 ; 239 Conn. 599 . Cited. 14 Conn.Supp. 51 ; 18 CS 62.