Conn. Gen. Stat. § 16-19
(1949 Rev., S. 5409; 1969, P.A. 217; 1972, P.A. 192, S. 1; P.A. 74-216, S. 2, 8; P.A. 75-486, S. 8, 69; P.A. 77-121; 77-614, S. 162, 587, 610; P.A. 78-303, S. 85, 136; P.A. 80-482, S. 55, 348; P.A. 83-190, S. 1-3; P.A. 84-113, S. 1, 2, 4; 84-342, S. 9, 13; 84-546, S. 49, 173; P.A. 85-33, S. 1; P.A. 87-202, S. 1; 87-331, S. 1, 4; P.A. 89-327, S. 5, 7; P.A. 94-83 , S. 12 , 16 ; 94-242 , S. 2 , 9 ; P.A. 98-28 , S. 89 , 117 ; P.A. 00-17 , S. 1 ; P.A. 01-49 , S. 4 ; P.A. 11-61 , S. 6 ; 11-80 , S. 1 ; P.A. 13-119 , S. 4 ; P.A. 14-134 , S. 50 ; P.A. 17-138 , S. 1 .)
This section and Sec. 16-20 compared. 91 C. 138 . Nature of power to regulate rates; what considered in determining their reasonableness; discrimination. Id., 692. Power of commission to change rate fixed by contract between a utility and a municipality. 101 C. 158 . Cited. 103 C. 206 . Establishment of changed rate schedule is not conditioned upon prior approval by commission. 132 C. 497 , 509. Power to direct suspension of rate schedule. Id., 510. Cited. 158 C. 626 ; 159 Conn. 327 ; 166 Conn. 328 ; 169 Conn. 344 ; 174 C. 258 ; 176 Conn. 191 ; 183 Conn. 128 ; 188 C. 90 ; 196 C. 451 ; 216 Conn. 627 ; 219 Conn. 121 ; 234 Conn. 624 . Cited. 19 CS 359 . Scope of commission's power in determining rate schedules; fact that commission did not take into consideration tax-free nature of dividends paid to corporation owner of a public utility in setting rate schedule of such utility, held not to invalidate action of commission. 21 CS 69. Rates could not be so low as to be confiscatory or so high as to exceed value of service to the consumer; what constitutes reasonable rate is primarily question of fact, depending largely on circumstances of particular case. 24 CS 441. Proposal filed must be amendment of existing rate schedule. 29 CS 379 . Cited. 30 CS 149 ; 31 CS 65 ; 34 CS 172 ; 40 Conn.Supp. 520 . Subsec. (g): Department's authority to order interim rate reduction is discretionary and statute does not require an interim rate reduction hearing to result in direct cash benefit to taxpayers; department decision to allow power company to apply part of its projected over-earnings toward accelerated amortization of certain regulatory assets as part of interim rate decrease found to be within department's authority. 252 C. 115 . Legislature deliberately created distinct procedure to examine need for temporary rate decrease between full rate cases, and department did not violate public service company's federal or state due process rights by holding an expedited hearing. 51 CS 307.
See Sec. 16-11 re condition of plant, equipment and manner of operation of public service companies. See Sec. 16-19h re reopening of water company rate proceedings. See Sec. 16a-49 re conservation and load management program.