Section 25-781 - Sale to minors or intoxicated persons prohibited(a) The sale or delivery of alcoholic beverages to the following persons is prohibited: (1) A person under 21 years of age, either for the person's own use or for the use of any other person, except as provided in § 25-784(b); or(2) An intoxicated person, or any person who appears to be intoxicated.(3) [Repealed by 2022 Amendment.](b) A retail licensee shall not permit at the licensed establishment the consumption of an alcoholic beverage by any of the following persons: (1) A person under 21 years of age; or(2) An intoxicated person, or any person who appears to be intoxicated.(3). [Repealed by 2022 Amendment.](c) A licensee or other person shall not, at a licensed establishment, give, serve, deliver, or in any manner dispense an alcoholic beverage to a person under 21 years of age, except as provided in § 25-784(b).(d) A licensee shall not be liable to any person for damages claimed to arise from refusal to sell an alcoholic beverage or refusal to permit the consumption of an alcoholic beverage in its establishment under the authority of this section.(e) A person alleged to have violated this section may be issued a citation under § 23-1110(b)(1). The person shall not be eligible to forfeit collateral.(f) For violations of subsection (a), (b), or (c) of this section , the penalties shall be the following: (1) Upon the 1st violation, the Board shall fine the licensee not less than $2,000, and not more than $3,000, and suspend the licensee for 5 consecutive days; provided, that the 5-day suspension may be stayed by the Board for one year if all employees who serve alcoholic beverages in the licensed establishment complete an alcohol training program within 3 months;(2) Upon the 2nd violation in 2 years, the Board shall fine the licensee not less than $3,000, and not more than $5,000, and suspend the licensee for 10 consecutive days; provided, that the Board may stay up to 6 days of the 10-day suspension for one year if all employees who serve alcoholic beverages in the licensed establishment complete an alcohol training program within 3 months;(3) Upon the 3rd violation in 3 years, the Board shall fine the licensee not less than $5,000, and not more than $10,000, and suspend the license for 15 consecutive days, or revoke the license; provided, that the Board may stay up to 5 days of the 15-day suspension for one year if all employees who serve alcoholic beverages in the licensed establishment complete an alcohol training program within 3 months;(4) Upon the 4th violation in 4 years, the Board may revoke the license or impose a fine of no less than $30,000; and(5) Upon the 5th or subsequent violation in 4 years, the Board shall revoke the license.(f-1) The stayed suspension days imposed by the Board pursuant to subsection (f) of this section shall activate and be served by the licensee upon a finding by the Board that the licensee has committed another primary tier violation within one year of the date that the violation that resulted in the stayed suspension was adjudicated.(g)(1) In determining whether a licensee has a prior violation for the purposes of subsection (f) of this section, the 4-year period is the 4 years immediately preceding the date of the incident or conduct in the case pending before the Board for which the licensee has been found liable of violating subsection (a), (b), or (c) of this section, either by an order of the Board, the Board's acceptance of an offer-in-compromise, or the licensee's payment of a fine.(2) A prior violation falls within the 4-year period if the date that the licensee was found liable of violating subsection (a), (b), or (c) of this section, either by an order of the Board, the Board's acceptance of an offer-in-compromise, or the licensee's payment of a fine, falls within the 4-year period.(3) For the purposes of this subsection, the term "offer-in-compromise" means a negotiation between the government and the respondent to settle the charges brought by the government for those violations committed by the respondent.(h)(1) It shall be an affirmative defense to a charge under this section that the licensee or the licensee's employee was shown and inspected a fake or fraudulent identification document of such quality, and that lacked any of the indicia of a fake or fraudulent identification listed in paragraph (2) of this subsection, that a reasonable person would believe that it was valid.(2) For the purposes of this subsection, if at the time of inspection, any of the following were present, the presumption shall be that a reasonable person would not believe that the identification document shown was valid: (A) The identification was visibly damaged.(B) The identification lacked the physical materials or features of the valid identification being imitated.(C) The photograph contained in the identification that was shown did not match the bearer.(D) The identification is displayed past the printed expiration date.(E) The licensee or their agent knew the person was under the age of 21.Amended by D.C. Law 24-127, § 2 , 69 DCR 008332, eff. 6/30/2022.Jan. 24, 1934, 48 Stat. 331, ch. 4, § 20; Aug. 27, 1935, 49 Stat. 901, ch. 756, § 10; June 29, 1953, 67 Stat. 104, ch. 159, § 404(g); Sept. 29, 1982, D.C. Law 4-157, § 12, 29 DCR 3617; Sept. 26, 1984, D.C. Law 5-106, § 2, 31 DCR 3381; Feb. 24, 1987, D.C. Law 6-178, § 2(a), 33 DCR 7654; Mar. 7, 1987, D.C. Law 6-217, §12, 34 DCR 907; Sept. 11, 1993, D.C. Law 10-12, § 2(c), 40 DCR 4020; May 24, 1994, D.C. Law 10-122, § 2(i), 41 DCR 1658; May 3, 2001, D.C. Law 13-298, § 101, 48 DCR 2959; Oct. 1, 2002, D.C. Law 14-190, § 1702(k), 49 DCR 6968; Mar. 25, 2009, D.C. Law 17-361, § 2(c)(5), 56 DCR 1204; May 2, 2015, D.C. Law 20-270, § 2(e)(8), 62 DCR 1866; Mar. 9, 2016, D.C. Law 21-84, § 2(e)(5), 63 DCR 781; Apr. 7, 2017, D.C. Law 21-260, § 2(f)(6), 64 DCR 2079; Oct. 30, 2018, D.C. Law 22-165, § 2(f)(7), 65 DCR 9366.