Section 15-25-2 - Prosecution for physical or sexual offense or exploitation involving child or a protected person - Videotaped deposition; who may be present; procedure; protective order(a) In any criminal prosecution referred to in Section 15-25-1, the court, upon motion of the district attorney or Attorney General, for good cause shown and after notice to the defendant, may order the taking of a video deposition of an alleged victim of or witness to the crime who is a child or a protected person at the time of the order.(b) On any motion for a video deposition of the victim or a witness, the court shall consider the nature of the offense, the nature of testimony that may be expected, and the possible effect that the testimony in person at trial may have on the victim or witness, along with any other relevant matters that may be required by Supreme Court rule.(c) During the recording of a video deposition , the following persons shall be in the room with the child or the protected person: (1) The prosecuting attorney.(2) The attorney for the defendant.(3) A person whose presence, in the judgment of the court, contributes to the well-being of the child or protected person and who has dealt with the child or the protected person in a therapeutic setting regarding the abuse.(4) Additional persons, other than the defendant, may be admitted into the room in the discretion of the court.(d) Examination and cross-examination of the alleged victim or witness shall proceed at the taking of the video deposition as though the alleged victim or witness were testifying personally in the trial of the case. The state shall provide the attorney for the defendant with a copy of the video deposition at a suitable and reasonable time prior to the trial of the case. The court shall enter a protective order prohibiting the attorney for the defendant from copying, reproducing, or distributing the video deposition. Objections to the introduction into the record of the deposition shall be heard by the judge in whose presence the deposition was taken, and unless the court determines that its introduction in lieu of the victim's or witness's actual appearance as a witness at the trial will unfairly prejudice the defendant, the video deposition shall be entered into the record by the state in lieu of the direct testimony of the alleged victim or witness and shall be viewed and heard at the trial of the case.(e) For the purposes of this section, "video deposition" means the recording of video, with sound, of witness testimony made under oath to be entered in the record in a judicial proceeding.(f) The Supreme Court may adopt rules of procedure regarding the taking and use of video depositions in criminal proceedings and juvenile cases, as well as transcription of video depositions in appeals of those cases.(g) All costs associated with the recording of a deposition ordered pursuant to this article shall be paid by the state. The district attorney shall submit all related cost bills to the state Comptroller for approval and payment from the fund entitled Court Costs Not Otherwise Provided For.(h) All recordings of video depositions ordered pursuant to this article shall be subject to any protective order of the court for the purpose of protecting the privacy of the victim of the offense.(i) When necessary, the operator of the equipment used to record video depositions may also be in the room during the taking of the deposition and the operator shall make every effort to be unobtrusive.(j) Only the court, the prosecuting attorney, and the attorney for the defendant may question the victim or witness. During the testimony of the child or protected person, the defendant shall be provided access to view the testimony out of the presence of the child or protected person and shall be allowed to communicate with his or her attorney by any appropriate election method.(k) In circumstances where a defendant in a proceeding has elected to proceed without counsel, the court may appoint counsel for the defendant and may order counsel to question a child or a protected person on behalf of the pro se defendant if the court finds that there is substantial likelihood that the child or protected person would experience emotional harm if the defendant were allowed to question the child or protected person.Ala. Code § 15-25-2 (1975)
Amended by Act 2022-201,§ 1, eff. 7/1/2022.Amended by Act 2021-373,§ 1, eff. 8/1/2021.Acts 1985, No. 85-743, p. 1143, §2; Act 2007-391, p. 782, §1.