Vt. R. Prob. P. 5
Reporter's Notes-2023 Amendment
Rule 5(e) is amended to add paragraph (8) regarding paper documents. New paragraph 5(e)(8) specifies that paper documents must be filed in certain proceedings in the Probate Division. Although the document may be filed electronically and made part of the electronic case file, the original paper document or a certified copy of the document must also be submitted to the court before the court will consider a petition or motion referencing the document to ensure the authenticity of the document. The filers submitted the paper document should indicate to the court that it is being submitted pursuant to V.R.P.P. 78 and should be retained until proceeding is final. V.R.P.P. 78(c)(2).
Reporter's Notes-2020 Amendment
This rule was amended, at the same time as V.R.C.P. 5, in anticipation of electronic filing in the probate division using eCabinet, the experimental efiling system. The system was never implemented in the probate division and never will be. The new case management system will, however, be used in the probate division when it is rolled out. The intent is to repeal sections of the rule on electronic filing for ecabinet and under the 2010 Vermont Rules of Electronic Filing and make service rules subject to the 2020 Vermont Rules of Electronic Filing as it is rolled out, as well as to the new version of the Vermont Rules for Public Access to Court Records. The specifics of the amendments are identical or very similar to the 2020 amendments of V.R.C.P. 5 and are described in the Reporter's Notes to those amendments. Those notes should be consulted to determine the intent of the drafting for these amendments.
Reporter's Notes-2019 Amendment
Rule 5(f) is redesignated as Rule 5(f)(1) and Rule 5(f)(2) is added to provide a "prisoner's mailbox" procedure for the filing of documents after the petition in a probate proceeding by an inmate confined in an institution. The provision is virtually identical to the simultaneously added V.R.P.P. 3(e) providing the procedure for irmiate filing of a petition. See Reporter's Notes to that rule. It is also substantially identical to V.R.C.P. 5(e)(4) and V.R.A.P. 25(a)(2)(C), promulgated effective August 13,2018.
Reporter's Notes-2017 Amendment
Rule 5(e) as originally promulgated is deleted and replaced by language viltually identical to V.R.C.P. 5(h), as simultaneously amended. These rules require a certificate of service to be filed after service of any document under Rule 5. They apply to filings by attomeys as well as by self-represented patties.
To clarify and make uniform the procedures, the amendments make clear that the celtificate may be incorporated in the document filed or be on a separate page and may embrace multiple documents. Further, the amendments make clear that a document filed without a certificate should be accepted for filing, subject to compliance with the order of the judge conceming the filing of a proper certificate.
Many self-represented parties are unfamiliar with the requirement of Rule 5(a) that every filing with the court must also be sent to all other parties or, by viltue of Rule 5(b), their lawyers. The rule amendment is designed to assure the court that other parties have been informed of the filing. It eliminates the problem of a court ruling on a motion because the time to respond has passed and it is unopposed, only to find out later, when a motion to reconsider or reopen is filed, that the other parties were not even aware ofthe motion until the court's ruling.
Even when lawyers appear in a case there are times when it is unclear whether service has been made-for example, where new counsel came in close to the time of a filing, and it is not apparent whether the filing was served on the new counsel. This lack of clarity can lead to misunderstandings, wasted hearing time, reconsideration, or time spent by court staff calling or emailing counsel to determine who has been served.
The rule is not intended to change the requirements of Rule 5 regarding what documents must be served or the manner of service. Federal Civil Rule 5(d) has required certificates of service since 1991. See 4B C. Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice & Procedure: Civil § 1150 (3d ed. 2002).