Rule 612 - Writing or Object Used to Refresh a Witness's Memory(a) Scope. This rule gives an adverse party certain options when a witness uses a writing or object to refresh memory: (2) before testifying, if the court decides that justice requires the party to have those options.(b) Adverse Party's Options; Deleting Unrelated Matter. An adverse party is entitled to have the writing or object produced at the trial, hearing, or deposition to inspect it, to cross-examine the witness about it, and to introduce in evidence any portion that relates to the witness's testimony. But if production of the writing or object at the trial, hearing, or deposition is impracticable, the court may order it made available for inspection. If the producing party claims that a writing includes unrelated matter, the court must examine the writing in camera, delete any unrelated portion, and order that the rest be delivered to the adverse party. Any portion deleted over objection must be preserved for the record. (c) Failure to Produce or Deliver the Writing or Object. If a writing or object is not produced or is not delivered as ordered, the court may issue any appropriate order. But if the prosecution does not comply in a criminal case, the court must strike the witness's testimony or, if justice so requires, declare a mistrial. EXPLANATORY NOTE Rule 612 was amended, effective 3/1/1990;3/1/2014. Rule 612 is identical to Rule 612 of the Uniform Rules of Evidence (1974). The rule varies from its federal counterpart in that it applies to objects as well as to writings. It was felt that objects used to refresh the memory of a witness, such as a recording tape, should be subject to production. This rule also departs from the federal rule by explicitly providing for inspection of writing or object at its location if production of the writing or object at trial is impracticable. Subdivisions (a) and (b) were amended, effective 3/1/1990. The amendments are technical in nature and no substantive change is intended. Rule 612 was amended, effective3/1/2014, in response to the12/1/2011, revision of the Federal Rules of Evidence. The language and organization of the rule were changed to make the rule more easily understood and to make style and terminology consistent throughout the rules. There is no intent to change any result in any ruling on evidence admissibility. SOURCES: Joint Procedure Committee Minutes of April 26-27, 2012, page 26; March 24 25, 1988, page 12;12/3/1987, pages 15 16;6/3/1976, page 3. Rule 612, Uniform Rules of Evidence (1974); Fed.R.Ev. 612; Rule 612, SBAND proposal. N.D.R.Crim.P. 16 (Discovery and Inspection).