Me. R. Evid. 403
The court may exclude relevant evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by a danger of one or more of the following: unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, misleading the jury, undue delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative evidence.
Me. R. Evid. 403
Maine Restyling Note [November 2014]
Maine Rule 403 and Federal Rule 403 are substantively identical, and therefore the Advisory Committee recommends adoption of the language of the restyled Federal Rule.
Federal Advisory Committee Note
The language of Rule 403 has been amended as part of the restyling of the Evidence Rules to make them more easily understood and to make style and terminology consistent throughout the rules. These changes are intended to be stylistic only. There is no intent to change any result in any ruling on evidence admissibility.
.