The motion or application and supporting papers may be prepared by the attorney for an adverse party or by an attorney obtained by an adverse party to represent the interests of the minor.
Me. R. Civ. P. 17A
See 14 M.R.S.A. §1605, regarding minor settlements to be approved by court.
Advisory Committee's Notes - 1988
Rule 17A is amended to assure that the court receives sufficient information about the nature of a minor's injuries and their cause to permit an informed evaluation of a request for settlement. The amendment is also intended to provide more protection to the minor by requiring verification of deposits and better confirmation that all parties have agreed to the settlement.
Throughout the Rule, the word "minor" has been substituted for "infant" as more in accord with current terminology.
Rule 17A(b) has been substantially rewritten. Paragraph (1) has been amended to specify procedures for waiving hearing if hearing is not desired. A new paragraph (2) has been added, requiring a detailed statement of the nature and the causes of the minor's injury or damages, with special requirements for detail in independent reports where a settlement is for more than $5,000 or is presented by adverse parties. A new paragraph (4) has been added to require written indication of approval of settlements by defendants not represented by counsel. Paragraph (5) has been added to require that a draft order be submitted, detailing the financial arrangements and fund distributions.
Rule 17A(e) has been added. The provision requires verification that required deposits have in fact been made and that the depository institution has received a copy of the court's order, including any restrictions on withdrawal.
Advisory Committee's Notes- June 2, 1997
Subdivision (c) of Rule 17A is amended to make clear that the court approval of a minor settlement may include a provision for payments after the minor has reached the age of 18. This change authorizes the use of special needs trusts or other continuing payments where medical or other needs may be arranged for the minor's best advantage early in the minor's life. The court will continue to be guided by the minor's best interests, as 14 M.R.S.A. §1605 (Supp. 1995) intends.
Advisory Committee's Notes - May 1, 1999
Rule 17A(c) and (d) are amended to give the court more flexibility in approving minor settlements. Prior to the amendment, the language of the rule appeared to limit the parties and the court to the deposit of funds in a bank. The best interests of the minor can be served by more flexible arrangements, such as trusts created and administered under court supervision. Although the parties now have the flexibility to propose a trust for the minor benefit, the court still retains final authority on approval of the terms of the trust and any withdrawals therefrom.
Advisory Committee's Notes - May 1, 2000
The amendment substitutes the word "minor" for "infant" in the title. The text of the rule is not changed.
Annotations:
Rule 17A: Minor settlement approval standard. Corey v. Corey, 2002 ME 132, 7.
[7] Title 14 M.R.S.A. §1605 (Supp. 2001) requires that the court approve a settlement on behalf of a minor, whether the minor is plaintiff or defendant. Although we have not previously articulated a standard to be used in evaluating such settlements, we agree with the federal district court that the court "must review the terms of the compromise and settlement and assure itself that the settlement is fair, reasonable and in the best interests of the minor." Holbrook v. Andersen Corp., 756 F. Supp. 34, 38 (D. Me. 1991) (applying Maine law). Since this evaluation involves the weighing of various factors and the assessment of the likely legal and factual outcome if the case were to proceed to trial, our review is for abuse of discretion. (Footnotes omitted.)
Advisory Note - June 2014
This new Rule 16C provides an expedited track for specified cases.