COMMENT: Rule 6.101(1)(c). Rule 6.101(1)(c) is intended to supersede prior caselaw that held a timely rule 1.904(2) motion must also have been "proper" to extend the time for appeal. See, e.g., Hedlund v. State, 875 N.W.2d 720, 725 (Iowa 2016). To avoid controversies over whether a rule 1.904(2) motion tolls the time for appeal, rule 6.101 authorizes any timely rule 1.904(2) motion to extend the appeal deadline, subject to an exception for successive motions.
Under rule 6.101(1)(c), the timely filing of a rule 1.904(2) motion extends the deadline for filing a notice of appeal or an application for interlocutory appeal. See Iowa Rs. App. P. 6.101(1)(b), 6.104(1)(c). However, the rule does not address whether a rule 1.904(2) motion preserves error for purposes of appeal as to evidence or arguments raised for the first time in that motion. See, e.g., Tenney v. Atl. Assocs., 594 N.W.2d 11, 14 (Iowa 1999). The rule does not affect prior caselaw concerning a court's inherent authority to reconsider. See Iowa Elec. Light & Power Co. v. Lagle, 430 N.W.2d 393, 395-96 (Iowa 1988). [Court Order November 18, 2016, effective March 1, 2017; September 29, 2023, effective April 1, 2024]
Iowa. R. App. P. 6.101