Fl. Prob. R. 5.241
Committee Notes
It is the committee's opinion that the failure to timely file the proof of publication of the notice to creditors will not affect time limitations for filing claims or objections.
On April 19, 1988, the United States Supreme Court decided Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. Pope, 485 U.S. 478, 108 S. Ct. 1340, 99 L. Ed. 2d 565. This case substantially impacted the method for handling (and barring) creditors' claims. This case stands for the proposition that a creditor may not be barred by the usual publication if that creditor was actually known to or reasonably ascertainable by the personal representative, and the personal representative failed to give notice to the creditor by mail or other means as certain to ensure actual notice. Less than actual notice in these circumstances would deprive the creditor of due process rights under the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Probably actual notice of the death (as in the case of a hospital where the decedent died as a patient) without notice of the institution of probate proceedings is not sufficient.
An elementary and fundamental requirement of due process in any proceeding which is to be accorded finality is notice reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances, to apprise interested persons of the pendency of the proceeding and afford them an opportunity to present their claims.
The steps to be taken by a personal representative in conducting a diligent search for creditors depends, in large measure, on how familiar the personal representative is with the decedent's affairs. Therefore, the committee believes it is inappropriate to list particular steps to be taken in each estate, since the circumstances will vary from case to case.
The statement required by this rule is not intended to be jurisdictional but rather to provide evidence of satisfaction (or lack thereof) of the due process requirements.
Rule History
2002 Revision: New rule to implement procedures consistent with new section 733.2121, Florida Statutes.
2003 Revision: Committee notes revised.
2005 Revision: Subdivision (a) amended to clarify approved methods of service on creditors. Committee notes revised.
2007 Revision: New subdivision (e) added to require service of a copy of the decedent's death certificate on the Agency for Health Care Administration, as is now required by section 733.2121(3)(d), Florida Statutes.
2019 Revision: Subdivision (e) amended to clarify that a copy of a death certificate suffices.
2024 Revision: Subdivision (b)(2) was created to conform to an amendment to section 733.2121, Florida Statutes, which requires the notice to creditors to include a notice that the personal representative has no duty to determine if property is subject to the Florida Uniform Disposition of Community Property Rights at Death Act. Committee notes revised.
Statutory References
ch. 50, Fla. Stat. Legal and official advertisements.
§ 731.301, Fla. Stat. Notice.
§ 733.2121, Fla. Stat. Notice to creditors; filing of claims.
§ 733.702, Fla. Stat. Limitations on presentation of claims.
§ 733.703, Fla. Stat. Form and manner of presenting claim.
§ 733.704, Fla. Stat. Amendment of claims.
§ 733.705, Fla. Stat. Payment of and objection to claims.
§ 733.708, Fla. Stat. Compromise.
Rule Reference
Fla. Prob. R. 5.490 Form and manner of presenting claim.