The Courts comprising the Judicial Conference are greatly concerned about the increasing number of requests by attorneys for continuances based upon conflicts in their schedules.
The Conference, therefore, wishes to remind each attorney of this responsibility to keep a close personal check on this trial schedule. When a conflict exists, the attorney should promptly attempt to resolve it, either by arranging for another attorney to handle one of the conflicting matters, or otherwise resolving the conflict without the necessity of a continuance of either matter.
If the scheduling conflict cannot be resolved, the Judge or Judges to whom the conflicting cases are assigned (or the Clerk if a Judge has not been assigned) should immediately be notified in writing of the existence of the conflict, the caption, nature and subject matter of the conflicting cases, the names of all attorneys involved in each, and a statement of (a) the reasons why the conflict cannot be resolved, (b) the relative importance of the conflicting cases, (c) the relative inconvenience to parties, witnesses and others if a continuance is granted, (d) the dates on which each court fixed the trial dates and whether the court which created the scheduling conflict was aware that a conflict was being created, (e) whether the other parties (or attorneys) object to the continuance, and (f) other information which will be helpful to the Judge or Judges in deciding which of the conflicting matters should take precedence.
It is expected that the Judges will then confer and attempt to arrive at a harmonious ruling on the request consistent with the interest of justice. If the Judges involved cannot agree as to an appropriate resolution of the conflict, then priority shall be given to criminal cases over civil cases and to constitutional courts (excluding Justice of the Peace Courts) over statutory courts.
Del. Fam. Ct. R. Crim. P. 23