Form 7 illustrates the required caption for all documents created using a word-processing system. Form 7A illustrates the required caption for all documents filed by a self-represented party who does not have access to a word-processing system and is unable to obtain and complete Form 7.
Any relative whose name could be used to determine the name of a person protected under this subsection must also be identified by initials or appropriate general descriptive terms. When the defendant in a criminal case is a family member of the person protected under this subsection, the defendant may be named.
C.A.R. 32
Comments
2000
This rule conforms the appellate practice to the forms of case captions provided in C.R.C.P. 10 for all documents that are filed in Colorado courts, including both criminal and civil cases. The purpose of the form captions is to provide a uniform and consistent format that enables practitioners, clerks, administrators, and judges to locate identifying information more efficiently.
The preferred case caption format for documents initiated by a party is found in subsection (c)(1)(I). The preferred caption for documents issued by the court or clerk of court is found in subsection (c)(1)(II). Because some parties may have difficulty formatting their documents to include vertical lines and boxes, alternate case caption formats are found in subsections (c)(2)(I) and (c)(2)(II). However, the box format is the preferred and recommended format.
The boxes may be vertically elongated to accommodate additional party and attorney information if necessary. The "court use" and "case number" boxes, however, shall always be located in the upper right side of the caption.
Forms approved by the State Court Administrator's Office (designated "JDF" or "SCAO" on preprinted or computer-generated forms), forms set forth in the Colorado Court Rules, volume 12, C.R.S. (including those pre-printed or computer-generated forms designated "CRCP" or "CPC" and those contained in the appendices of volume 12, C.R.S.), and forms generated by the state's judicial electronic system, "ICON," shall conform to criteria established by the State Court Administrator's Office with the approval of the Colorado Supreme Court. This includes preprinted and computer-generated forms. JDF and SCAO forms and a flexible form of caption which allows the entry of additional party and attorney information are available and can be downloaded from the Colorado courts web page at http://www.courts.state.co.us/scao/Forms.htm.
2014
This rule conforms the appellate practice to the forms of case captions provided in C.R.C.P. 10 for all documents filed in Colorado appellate courts. The purpose of the form caption is to provide a uniform and consistent format that enables practitioners, clerks, administrators, and judges to locate identifying information more efficiently. The preferred case caption format for documents initiated by a party is found in subsection (d)(1). Parties who cannot format documents to include vertical lines and boxes may use the alternate case caption format in subsections (d)(2). However, the box format is the preferred and recommended format.
2015
The purpose of the form caption is to provide a uniform and consistent format that enables practitioners, clerks, administrators, and judges to locate identifying information more efficiently. The changes to this rule make the appellate practice caption forms consistent with the forms of case captions provided in C.R.C.P. 10 for all documents filed in Colorado appellate courts.
The required case caption format for documents created using a word-processing system is found in Form 7. Self-represented parties who do not have access to a word-processing system and cannot format documents to include vertical lines and boxes may use the alternate case caption format in Form 7A. However, Form 7 caption format is preferred and recommended.
Subsection (f) is a new subsection. It is based on the legislative requirements set forth in Colo. Rev. Stat. §§ 19-1-102 (1.7), 19-1-109(1), and 24-72-304(4)(a), and is consistent with longstanding court practice.
Prior subsection (e), formerly titled "Improper Form and Briefs of Other Papers," now titled "Non-Compliant Documents" and (f) titled "Certificate of Compliance" have been re-lettered to subsections (g) and (h), respectively. The substance of the prior subsections has not changed.
2023
Prior subsection (f)(1) was ambiguous; it was unclear whether the provision applied in civil cases. The change clarifies that in both criminal and civil cases relating to sexual assault, initials should be used when referring to a victim or alleged victim.
Annotation Law reviews. For article, "Amendments to Appellate Rules Concerning Type Size and Word Count", see 34 Colo. Law. 27 (June 2005). For article, "Complying With C.A.R. 28 and 32", see 39 Colo. Law. 65 (November 2010). Noncompliance will result in dismissal. Where an appellant fails to comply with this provision, the appeal will be dismissed. Dubois v. People, 26 Colo. 165, 57 P. 187 (1899). Example of noncompliance. A reply brief which is in indistinct and blurred typewriting flagrantly violates this provision. Mitchell v. Pearson, 34 Colo. 281, 82 P. 447 (1905). .