Such fees shall be in addition to any fee for delinquent filing of the affidavit required by section (c) as set forth below in sub§ 2. Failure to complete the requirements of section (a) by September 15 may result in a motion for summary suspension pursuant to section (i) of this rule.
Failure to file the affidavit by December 15 may result in a motion for summary suspension pursuant to section (i) of this rule.
Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. 45
NOTES TO 1996 AMENDMENTS
Rule 45 (a) requires every nonexempt "active member" to participate in mandatory continuing legal education. An active member is defined by Rule 31(c)(2), Rules of the Supreme Court, as persons licensed to practice law "except for persons who are inactive, suspended, or judicial members." Full-time appellate court judges, superior court judges, and judges of courts of limited jurisdiction are judicial members under Rule 31(c)(5). As such, they are not "active members" of the state bar and are, therefore, not subject to the requirements of Rule 45. Instead, the Council on Judicial Education and Training (COJET) is the regulatory body responsible for implementing and ensuring compliance with the educational requirements for judicial members.
Likewise, although active members subject to COJET must file an affidavit of compliance with the state bar pursuant to section (b)(2) of this rule, once the state bar has determined that such active members are exempt under section (b)(2), its jurisdiction ends and COJET is responsible for enforcing educational compliance through audits or other methods.
COURT COMMENT [AMENDMENT EFFECTIVE JUNE 1, 1998 ]
The Court recognizes that as a practical matter, in order to insure sufficient offerings of a professionalism course to permit members of the bar to satisfy new Rule 45(a)(3) within the time frame specified, the State Bar of Arizona must approve or license others to present courses on the principles of professionalism, but has been assured by the State Bar that such approval will only be granted to courses that adhere to the curriculum of the Professionalism Course presented by the State Bar itself. The quality of the faculty teaching any CLE course, and particularly a course on professionalism, is an essential ingredient in the course's success.
The permission granted to specialty sections of the Bar and other similar organizations to offer courses on professionalism that allow their members to satisfy the requirements of new subsection (a)(3) should not contribute to the "balkanization" of members of the profession along special interest lines. Sections and organizations which seek approval for such alternative professionalism course offerings shall permit non-members of such sections and organizations to participate in the course, either as faculty members or attendees, and shall adhere to the prescribed curriculum.
HISTORICAL NOTES
Order dated Dec. 12, 1991, filed Dec. 18, 1991, effective Jan. 1, 1992, provided in part 23:
"These amendments shall not apply to discipline proceedings governed by the disciplinary procedures in force prior to February 1, 1985. The amendments shall apply to all other discipline proceedings which were commenced as provided in Supreme Court Rule 53(a) either prior to or on or after the date hereof."
Deleted rule 45(i) [deleted Dec. 12, 1991, effective Jan. 1, 1992], added Oct. 11, 1989, retroactively effective to July 1, 1989, related to reinstatement from suspension.