Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. 30
[2021] COMMENT
Rule 30(a). This rule is not intended to prevent a party from retaining a transcriber, at the party's expense, to prepare an unofficial transcript of all or part of a proceeding. An unofficial transcript cannot be referenced or used in any court proceeding.
Rule 30(b)(1). In the absence of a timely request for a certified reporter, the court may still approve use of a certified reporter or electronic recording device to make the record of court proceedings. In exercising its discretion under subsection (b), the court should consider the following factors: the unique demands of making the official verbatim record in felony jury trials and initial determinations of sexually violent person status; the availability of a certified reporter; the probability that a transcript will be requested; the number of litigants; convenience of the parties and the court's schedule; sufficiency of another form of record to convey the substance of the matters discussed at the proceeding; whether testimonial evidence will be presented at the proceeding; presence of non-native English speakers as witnesses or parties; the likelihood that technical or otherwise difficult terminology will be used; the need for formal or informal proceedings; the need for a real-time transcript; the likelihood that daily transcripts will be required; and any other factor which in the interests of justice warrants a particular form of record, or as otherwise required to serve the interests of justice.
Rule 30(b)(3)(b). In designating the official record, the court should consider factors such as which party filed notice first, whether the notice was timely, and whether the notice included the required information about the certified reporter.
HISTORICAL NOTES
Former Rules 28 through 30 which were contained in Part V, Admission and Discipline of Attorneys, were deleted in the revision to that part in 1984.