Ariz. R. Prof'l. Cond. 1.15
Comment [2009 amendment]
[1] The 2009 amendments to E.R. 1.15 correspond with the 2009 amendments to Supreme Court Rule 43 on Trust Accounts. Supreme Court Rule 43 and the 2009 comments thereto contain additional requirements and procedures governing credit card transactions.
[2] For purposes of this rule, "merchant fees" and "credit card transaction fees" are fees that are deducted from the amount of the credit card charge to pay the company that issued the client's credit card, the lawyer or law firm's credit card processing service, and the credit card association (e.g., Visa, MasterCard). Those fees typically include a percentage of the total amount billed plus a fixed fee, which, unless paid by the lawyer or law firm, reduces the amount that can be credited to the client's account. A "chargeback" (or reversal of charges) occurs when a client or former client writes to the credit card company that issued the credit card used to pay a lawyer to dispute the amount that should be paid to the lawyer or law firm. When a client or former client does so, the lawyer's or law firm's account is debited an amount equal to the disputed amount, plus a chargeback fee.
[3] Lawyers and law firms are permitted, and in some cases may be required, to place their own funds into their trust accounts in very limited circumstances. Lawyers and law firms that accept payment by credit card for advance fees, costs or expenses must at all times maintain in their trust accounts sufficient funds of their own to pay fees and charges related to operation of the trust account, and to pay all merchant and credit card transaction fees, chargeback fees and related charges. Lawyers and law firms must make a reasonable determination of the amount of their own funds that may appropriately be kept in their trust accounts to pay trust account and credit card fees and charges. Lawyers and law firms that use credit card processing services that debit all chargebacks and credit card fees and charges from an operating or business account are not required to maintain their own funds in their trust accounts to cover those charges, since no client or third-party funds will be at risk due to debits from the trust account. Lawyers should consult Rule 43 on the circumstances when lawyer funds are required to be maintained in a trust account to avoid misappropriation or conversion of client or third-party funds.
Comment [2014 amendment]
[1] New paragraph (f) allows a lawyer to distribute funds or property in the lawyer's possession after providing notice to third persons known to claim an interest. Notice under paragraph (f) must be sufficient to allow the third person to take appropriate action to protect its interests. Although there is no one form of n otice that will be acceptable, the notice should generally include at least the following: (a) a description of the funds or property in the lawyer's possession; (b) the name of the client claiming an interest in the funds and other information reasonably available to the lawyer that would allow the third person to identify the claim or interest; (c) a mailing address, telephone number, and email address where the third party can provide notice to the lawyer of the commencement of an action asserting an interest in the funds or property; and (d) the proposed distribution of the funds or property. The notice shall be served in the manner provided under Rules 4.1 or 4.2 of the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure.
[2] Apart from their ethical obligations, lawyers may have legal obligations to safeguard third-party funds under applicable case and statutory law. The notice provisions of paragraph (f) do not alter a lawyer's legal obligations and duties to third persons with respect to funds or property in the lawyer's possession. A lawyer who proposes to distribute funds under this paragraph should carefully evaluate the underlying law governing the lawyer's obligations to safeguard funds in which third persons claim an interest, which may expose the lawyer to a risk of civil or other liability even if the notice provisions of paragraph (f) are satisfied.
[3] Before making any distribution of funds or property pursuant to paragraph (f), a lawyer should explain to the client that the client may remain responsible to satisfy valid claims of third persons, and that the third person's failure to commence an action within the 90-day period of paragraph (f) will not by itself operate to waive, reduce or extinguish the third person's claim, if any, against the client or the funds or property received by the client. Before making any distribution under paragraph (f), the lawyer must obtain the client's informed consent, confirmed in writing, to the distribution.