Example: Green, Jones, and White, unrelated individuals, are partners in the GJW partnership. The partners' interests in the capital and profits of the partnership are as follows:
Partner | Capital | Profits |
Green | 36% | 25% |
Jones | 50% | 71% |
White | 4% | 4% |
The GJW partnership owns the entire outstanding stock (one hundred (100) shares) of X Corporation. Under this subparagraph, Green is considered to own the X stock owned by the partnership in proportion to his interest in capital (36%) or profits (25%), whichever such proportion is the greater. Therefore, Green is considered to own thirty-six (36) shares of the X stock. However, since Jones has a greater interest in the profits of the partnership, he is considered to own the X stock in proportion to his interest in such profits. Therefore, Jones is considered to own seventy-one (71) shares of the X stock. Since White does not have an interest of five percent (5%) or more in either the capital or profits of the partnership, he is not considered to own any shares of the X stock.
Example: Brown, an individual, owns sixty (60) shares of the one hundred (100) shares of the only class of outstanding stock of corporation P. Smith, an individual, owns four (4) shares of the P stock, and corporation X owns thirty-six (36) shares of the P stock. Corporation P owns, directly and indirectly, fifty (50) shares of the stock of Corporation S. Under this subsection, Brown is considered to own thirty (30) shares of the S stock (60/100 X 50), and X is considered to own eighteen (18) shares of the S stock (36/100 X 50).
Since Smith does not own five percent (5%) or more in value of the P stock, he is not considered as owning any of the S stock owned by P. If, in this example, Smith's wife had owned directly 1 share of the P stock, Smith (and his wife) would each own five (5) shares of the P stock, and therefore Smith (and his wife) would be considered as owning 2.5 shares of the S stock (5/100 X 50).
Example:
Example (1): A, thirty (30) years of age, has a ninety percent (90%) interest in the capital and profits of a partnership. The partnership owns all the outstanding stock of corporation X and X owns sixty (60) shares of the One hundred (100) outstanding shares of corporation Y. Under paragraph 15B.3.1 of this section, the sixty (60) shares of Y constructively owned by the partnership by reason of paragraph 15B.2.4 of this section is treated as actually owned by the partnership for purposes of applying paragraph 15B.3.2 of these regulations. Therefore, A is considered as owning fifty-four (54) shares of the Y stock (ninety percent (90%) of sixty (60) shares).
Example (2): Assume the same facts as in Example (1). Assume further that B, who is twenty (20) years of age and the brother of A, directly owns forty (40) shares of Y stock. Although the stock of Y owned by B is considered as owned by C (the father of A and B) under subparagraph 15B.2.6.1 of this section, under paragraph 15B.3.2 of this section such stock may not be treated as owned by C for purposes of applying subparagraph 15B.2.6.2 of this section in order to make A the constructive owner of such stock.
Example (3): Assume the same facts assumed for purposes of Example (2), and further assume that C has an option to acquire the forty (40) shares of Y stock owned by his son, B. The rule contained in subparagraph (2) of this paragraph does not prevent the reattribu-tion of such forty (40) shares to A because, under subparagraph (3) of this paragraph, C is considered as owning the forty (40) shares by reason of option attribution and not by reason of family attribution. Therefore, since A satisfies the more-than-fifty percent (50%) stock ownership test contained in paragraph 15B.2.6.2 of this section with respect to Y, the forty (40) shares of Y stock constructively owned by C are reattributed to A, and A is considered as owning a total of ninety-four (94) shares of Y stock.
Example 1: Jones owns all the stock of corporation X and has an option to purchase from Smith all the outstanding stock of corporation Y. Smith owns all the outstanding stock of corporation Z. Since the Y stock is considered as owned by two (2) or more persons, under subparagraph 15B.3.2.2 of this section, the Y stock is treated as owned only by Smith since he has direct ownership of such stock. Therefore, on December 31, 1990, Y and Z are component members of the same brother-sister controlled group. If, however, Smith had owned his stock in corporation Z for less than one-half (1/2) of the number of days of Z's 1990 taxable year, then under paragraph 15B.3.1 of this section the Y stock would be treated as owned only by Jones since his ownership results in Y being a component member of a controlled group on December 31, 1990.
Example 2: Individual H owns directly all the outstanding stock of corporation M. W (the wife of H) owns directly all the outstanding stock of corporation N. Neither spouse is considered as owning the stock directly owned by the other because each of the conditions prescribed in subparagraph 15B.2.5.2 of this section is satisfied with respect to each corporation's 1990 taxable year. H owns directly sixty percent (60%) of the only class of stock of corporation P and W owns the remaining forty percent (40%) of the P stock. Under subparagraph 15B.4.2.3 of this section, the stock of P is treated as owned only by H since H owns (directly and with the application of the rules contained in paragraphs 15B.2.1, 15B.2.2, 15B.2.3, and 15B.2.4 of this section) the stock possessing the greatest percentage of the total value of shares of all classes of stock of P. Accordingly, on December 31, 1990, P is treated as a component member of a brother-sister group consisting of M and P.
Example 3: Unrelated individuals A and B each owns one-half (1/2) of all the outstanding stock of corporation R, which in turn owns seventy percent (70%) of the only class of outstanding stock of corporation S. The remaining thirty percent (30%) of the stock of corporation S is owned by unrelated individual C. Under the attribution rule of subsection 15B.2.4 of this section, A and B each is considered as owning thirty-five percent (35%) of the stock of corporation S. Accordingly, since 5 or fewer persons own at least eighty percent (80%) of the stock of corporations R and S and also own more than fifty percent (50%) identically (A and B's identical ownership each is 35%), on December 31, 1990, corporations R and S are treated as component members of the same brother-sister controlled group.
W. Va. Code R. § 110-13C-15B