Example A: If a candidate or political committee pays a consultant $5,000 to prepare and mail a political advertising brochure, all costs associated with the project shall be itemized by identifying each service provided, subvendor(s) used and amount attributable to each:
Vendor Name | Purpose | Amount |
Jones Consulting | Jones Consulting | $500 |
(fee) | $ 5,500 | |
ABC Graphics | $1,200 | |
XYZ Printing Co. (5,000 pieces) | $3,000 | |
Your Mailhouse | $800 |
Or, if Jones Consulting completes the project through a combination of services provided by its principals or employees and its subvendors:
Vendor Name | Purpose | Amount |
Jones Consulting | Jones Consulting | $500 |
(fee) | $ 5,500 | |
Jones Consulting (graphic design) | $1,200 | |
XYZ Printing Co. (5,000 pieces) | $3,000 | |
Your Mailhouse | $800 |
Example B: If a candidate or political committee pays a consultant or other agent directly to perform tasks such as fund-raising, survey design or campaign plan development, and the consultant does not use subvendors, the expense shall be reported as follows:
Vendor Name | Purpose | Amount |
Jones Consulting | Fund-raising, survey design, campaign plan development | $5,000 |
Example C: If an expenditure is made directly to a vendor to purchase broadcast political advertisement, the purpose shall include the following details for both the vendor and commercial advertiser:
Vendor Name | Purpose | Amount |
Media King | Television ads | $51,000 |
WZUB TV | $30,000 | |
WXXX | $10,000 | |
TV | ||
WCRB TV | $10,000 | |
Media King (fee) | $1,000 |
Wash. Admin. Code § 390-16-205
Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.370(1). 04-01-128, § 390-16-205, filed 12/18/03, effective 1/18/04; Order 74, § 390-16-205, filed 4/26/76.