Current through Register Vol. 54, No. 45, November 9, 2024
Rule 3546 - Orders-Factual StatementAfter reciting the relevant facts, the order shall set forth the following:
A. The identity of the investigative or law enforcement officers or agency to whom authority to intercept is given, i.e., the supervising officer named in the application along with all qualified members of the named agency.B. The identity of the Applicant and, if the Applicant is a designee, the identity of the District Attorney or Attorney General.C. The identity of, or a particular description of, the person(s), if known, whose communications are to be intercepted.D. The character and location of the particular communication facilities as to which, or the particular place as to which, authority to intercept is granted, except where a target specific order is at issue.E. A particular description of the type of communication to be intercepted and a statement of the particular offense(s) to which it relates.F. The period of time during which such interception is authorized not to exceed 30 days, or 60 days in the cases of orders authorizing production or disclosure of mobile communication tracking, the installation and use of pen registers, trap and trace devices, or telecommunication identification interception devices, including a statement as to whether or not the interception shall automatically terminate when the described communication has been first obtained. The order shall state that such interception or tracking is authorized only for that period of time necessary under the circumstances to accomplish the objectives of the interception or tracking. The order shall require that the interception or tracking begin and terminate as soon as practicable and that the interception be conducted in such a manner as to minimize or eliminate interception of communications not otherwise subject to interception under the Wiretap Act and require reasonable efforts, whenever possible, to reduce the hours of interception.G. The order shall require the Applicant to supervise the interception or tracking.H. The order should require periodic progress reports to the Issuing Judge indicating the progress made toward achieving the objective of the interception or tracking and the need for continued interception.I. If requested by the Applicant, the order shall direct the pertinent communications common carrier to furnish the Applicant with all information, facilities, and technical assistance necessary to accomplish the interception or tracking unobtrusively and with a minimum of interference with the services being afforded to the subject(s) of the interception. The order shall provide that the common carrier shall be compensated at prevailing rates.J. If requested by the Applicant, the order shall authorize the entry of the subject premises or facilities (or other premises necessary to gain entry into the subject premises) by the law enforcement officers previously authorized in the order to conduct the interception as often as necessary solely for the purpose of installing, maintaining or removing an interception device. The order shall further provide that such entry is found to be reasonably necessary to accomplish the purposes of the Wiretap Act and shall require that the Issuing Judge be notified of the time and method of each such entry in advance, if practical, and in any event, within 48 hours of entry.The provisions of this Rule 3546 adopted November 24, 2020, effective immediately, 50 Pa.B. 6994.