N.M. Admin. Code § 22.600.2.22

Current through Register Vol. 35, No. 21, November 5, 2024
Section 22.600.2.22 - COMPLAINT PROCEDURE AND DISQUALIFICATION
A. A party may make an informal, verbal complaint of a violation of this code with the chief hearing officer. Such complaints will be investigated internally and informally by the chief hearing officer as part of the management of personnel of the office. If the complaint is justified, the chief hearing officer may implement informal actions designed to educate or correct the hearings officer's conduct, mitigate the violation, or take other justified actions under the circumstances.
B. Whenever any party believes the hearing officer for any reason should be formally disqualified because there is a substantial doubt as to whether the hearing officer can conduct the matter fairly, such party may file with the chief hearing officer a formal written motion for disqualification of the assigned hearing officer, along with supporting affidavits or exhibits setting forth the alleged grounds for disqualification. A copy of the motion shall be served on the opposing party and on the hearing officer whose disqualification is sought.
(1) Upon receipt of a formal motion for disqualification, the chief hearing officer may:
(a) summarily dismiss the motion if it is clear that the complaint fails to state grounds that raise a reasonable doubt as to the hearing officer's ability to provide a fair and impartial hearing, is frivolous in that it either has the primary purpose of seeking to delay the proceeding or is an attempt to relitigate an unfavorable ruling that is better addressed as part of the traditional appellate process; or
(b) conduct further investigation either directly or through another agency or entity as circumstances justify; or
(c) in order to ensure an efficient hearing process in light of a mandatory jurisdictional deadline, reassign the case to another hearing officer pending further investigation. Such reassignment for efficiency of hearing process pending further investigation does not constitute a finding that the motion for disqualification has any validity, only a recognition of the practical jurisdictional deadlines applicable in a matter.
(2) If further investigation is merited, the hearing officer shall have 10 days from service of the motion to accede or to reply to the allegations. The noncomplaining other party may also choose to file a response within 10 days. If the hearing officer does not recuse himself or herself within that time, the chief hearing officer shall promptly review the complaint, the responses, and the results of any investigation to determine whether or not the hearing officer shall be disqualified. The chief hearing officer's determination shall be reduced to writing in the form of a letter or order and shall be included in the record of the proceeding. Subject to appellate review, the chief hearing officer's decision in response to a formal motion seeking disqualification shall be final.
C. If the hearing officer is disqualified, the chief hearing officer shall designate another person to act as hearing officer in the matter.
D. As a result of the motion for disqualification and any related investigation, the chief hearing officer may take other appropriate internal corrective or disciplinary personnel actions consistent with the State Personnel Act. Any such additional personnel action is confidential in accord with the controlling provisions of the State Personnel Act.
E. The complaining party's remedies for violations of this code are limited to disqualification of the hearing officer from the particular proceeding before the administrative hearings office. Nothing in this section creates an independent cause of action by either party outside of this complaint procedure described herein, or an independent basis to seek discipline under either the code of judicial conduct or the rules of professional conduct.

N.M. Admin. Code § 22.600.2.22

Adopted by New Mexico Register, Volume XXIX, Issue 02, January 30, 2018, eff. 2/1/2018