N.M. Admin. Code § 20.2.99.138

Current through Register Vol. 35, No. 21, November 5, 2024

Section 20.2.99.138 - CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES - INTERIM EMISSIONS IN AREAS WITHOUT MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSIONS BUDGETS

A. The transportation plan, TIP, and project not from a conforming transportation plan and TIP must satisfy the interim emissions test(s) as described in Subsections C through N of 20.2.99.128 NMAC. This criterion applies to the net effect of the action (transportation plan, TIP, or project not from a conforming transportation plan and TIP) on motor vehicle emissions from the entire transportation system.

B. Ozone areas. The requirements of this subsection (Subsection B of 20.2.99.138 NMAC) apply to all 1-hour ozone and 8-hour ozone NAAQS areas, except for certain requirements as indicated. This criterion may be met.

(1) In moderate and above ozone nonattainment areas that are subject to the reasonable further progress requirements of CAA Section 182(b)(1) if a regional emissions analysis that satisfies the requirements of 20.2.99.141 NMAC through 20.2.99.147 NMAC and Subsections G through L of 20.2.99.138 NMAC demonstrates that for each analysis year and for each of the pollutants described in Subsection F of 20.2.99.138 NMAC:

(a) the emissions predicted in the "action" scenario are less than the emissions predicted in the "baseline" scenario, and this can be reasonably expected to be true in the periods between the analysis years; and

(b) the emissions predicted in the "action" scenario are lower than 1990 emissions by any nonzero amount, in areas for the 1-hour ozone NAAQS as described in Subsection C of section 20.2.99.128 NMAC; or the 2002 emissions by any nonzero amount, in areas for the 8-hour ozone NAAQS as described in Subsections D and E of 20.2.99.128 NMAC.

(2) In marginal and below ozone nonattainment areas and other ozone nonattainment areas that are not subject to the reasonable further progress requirements of the Clean Air Act Section 182(b)(1) if a regional emissions analysis that satisfies the requirements of section 20.2.99.141 NMAC through 20.2.99.147 NMAC and Subsection G through J of 20.2.99.138 NMAC demonstrates that for each analysis year and for each of the pollutants described in Subsection F of 20.2.99.138 NMAC:

(a) the emissions predicted in the "action" scenario are not greater than the emissions predicted in the "baseline" scenario, and this can be reasonably expected to be true in the periods between the analysis years; or

(b) the emissions predicted in the "action" scenario are not greater than the 1990 emissions, in areas for the 1-hour NAAQS as described in Subsection C of 20.2.99.128 NMAC; or the 2002 emissions, in areas for the 8-hour ozone NAAQS as described in Subsections D and E for 20.2.99.128 NMAC.

C. CO areas. This criterion may be met:

(1) in moderate areas with design values greater than 12.7 ppm and serious CO nonattainment areas that are subject to Clean Air Act Section 187(a)(7) if a regional emissions analysis that satisfies they requirements of sections 20.2.99.141 NMAC through 20.2.99.147 NMAC and Subsections G through J of 20.2.99.138 NMAC demonstrates that for each analysis year and for each of the pollutants described in Subsection F of 20.2.99.138 NMAC:

(b) the emissions predicted in the "action" scenario are lower than 1990 emissions by any nonzero amount.

(2) in moderate areas with design values less than 12.7 ppm and not classified CO nonattainment areas if a regional emissions analysis that satisfies the requirements of sections 20.2.99.141 NMAC through 20.2.99.147 NMAC and Subsections G through J of 20.2.99.138 NMAC demonstrates that for each analysis year and for each of the pollutants described in Subsection F of 20.2.99.138 NMAC:

(b) the emissions predicted in the "action" scenario are not greater than 1990 emissions.

D. PM₁₀ and NO₂ areas. This criterion may be met in PM₁₀ and NO₂ nonattainment areas if a regional emissions analysis that satisfies the requirements of 20.2.99.141 NMAC through 20.2.99.147 NMAC and Subsections G through J of 20.2.99.138 NMAC demonstrates that for each analysis year and for each of the pollutants described in Subsection F of 20.2.99.138 NMAC, one of the following requirements is met:

(1) the emissions predicted in the "action" scenario are not greater than the emissions predicted in the "baseline" scenario, and this can be reasonably expected to be true in the periods between the analysis years; or

(2) the emissions predicted in the "action" scenario are not greater than baseline emissions; baseline emissions are those estimated to have occurred during calendar year 1990, unless the conformity implementation plan revision required by 40 CFR 51.390 defines the baseline emissions for a PM₁₀ area to be those occurring in a different calendar year for which a baseline emissions inventory was developed for the purpose of developing a control strategy implementation plan.

E. PM_2.5areas. This criterion may be met in PM_2.5nonattainment areas if a regional emissions analysis that satisfies the requirements of sections 20.2.99.141 NMAC through 20.2.99.147 NMAC and Subsections G through J of 20.2.99.138 NMAC demonstrates that for each analysis year and for each of the pollutants described in Subsection F of 20.2.99.138 NMAC, one of the following requirements is met:

(2) the emissions predicted in the "action" scenario are not greater than:

(a) 2002 emissions, in areas designated nonattainment for the 1997 PM_2.5NAAQS; or

(b) emissions in the most recent year for which EPA's air emissions reporting requirements ( 40 CFR Part 51, Subpart A) requires submission of on-road mobile source emissions inventories, as of the effective date of nonattainment designations for any PM_2.5NAAQS other than the 1997 PM_2.5NAAQS.

F. Pollutants. The regional emissions analysis must be performed for the following pollutants:

(1) VOC in ozone areas;

(2) NOx in ozone areas, unless the US EPA administrator determines that additional reductions of NOx would not contribute to attainment;

(3) CO in CO areas;

(4) PM₁₀ in PM₁₀ areas;

(5) VOC and/or NOx in PM₁₀ areas if the US EPA regional administrator or the department has made a finding that such precursor emissions from within the area are a significant contributor to the PM₁₀ nonattainment problem and has so notified the MPO and US DOT;

(6) NOx in NO₂ areas;

(7) PM_2.5areas;

(8) re-entrained road dust in PM_2.5areas only if the US EPA regional administrator or the department has made a finding that emissions from re-entrained road dust within the area are a significant contributor to the PM_2.5nonattainment problem and has so notified the MPO and US DOT;

(9) nitrogen oxides in PM_2.5areas, unless the EPA regional administrator and the department have made a finding that emissions of nitrogen oxides from within the area are not a significant contributor to the PM_2.5nonattainment problem and has so notified the MPO (or the NMDOT in the absence of an MPO) and US DOT; and

(10) VOC, SO₂ and/or ammonia in PM_2.5areas if the EPA regional administrator or the department has made a finding that any of such precursor emissions from within the area are a significant contributor to the PM_2.5nonattainment problem and has so notified the MPO (or the NMDOT in the absence of an MPO) and US DOT.

G. Analysis years.

(1) The regional emissions analysis must be performed for analysis years that are no more than ten (10) years apart. The first analysis year must be no more than five (5) years beyond the year in which the conformity determination is being made. The last year of the timeframe of the conformity determination (as described under Subsection D of 20.2.99.125 NMAC) must also be an analysis year.

(2) For areas using Subparagraph (a) of Paragraph (2) of Subsection B of section 20.2.99.138 NMAC, Subparagraph (a) of Paragraph (2) of Subsection C of section 20.2.99.138 NMAC, Paragraph (1) of Subsection D of section 20.2.99.138 NMAC, and Paragraph (1) of Subsection E of section 20.2.99.138 NMAC, a regional emissions analysis that satisfies the requirements of sections 20.2.99.141 NMAC through 20.2.99.147 NMAC and Subsections G through J of section 20.2.99.138 would not be required for analysis years in which the transportation projects and planning assumptions in the "action" and "baseline" scenarios are exactly the same. In such a case, Subsection A of section 20.2.99.138 NMAC can be satisfied by documenting that the transportation projects and planning assumptions in both scenarios are exactly the same, and consequently, the emissions predicted in the "action" scenario are not greater than the emissions predicted in the "baseline" scenario for such analysis years.

(3) When the timeframe of the conformity determination is shortened under Paragraph (2) of Subsection D of 20.2.99.125 NMAC, the conformity determination must be accompanied by a regional emissions analysis (for informational purposes only) for the last year of the transportation plan.

H. "Baseline" scenario. The regional emissions analysis required by Subsections B and E of 20.2.99.138 NMAC must estimate the emissions that would result from the "baseline" scenario in each analysis year. The "baseline" scenario must be defined for each of the analysis years. The "baseline" scenario is the future transportation system that will result from current programs, including the following (except that exempt projects listed in Subsection A of 20.2.99.149 NMAC and projects exempt from regional emissions analysis as listed in Subsection B of 20.2.99.149 NMAC need not be explicitly considered):

(1) all in-place regionally significant highway and transit facilities, services and activities;

(2) all ongoing travel demand management or transportation system management activities; and

(3) completion of all regionally significant projects, regardless of funding source, which are currently under construction or are undergoing right-of-way acquisition (except for hardship acquisition and protective buying); come from the first year of the previously conforming transportation plan and/or TIP; or have completed the NEPA process.

I. "Action" scenario. The regional emissions analysis required by Subsections B and C of 20.2.99.138 NMAC must estimate the emissions that would result from the "action" scenario in each analysis year. The "action" scenario must be defined for each of the analysis years. The "action" scenario is the transportation system that would result from the implementation of the proposed action (transportation plan, TIP, or project not from a conforming transportation plan and TIP) and all other expected regionally significant projects in the nonattainment area. The "action" scenario must include the following (except that exempt projects listed in Subsection A of 20.2.99.149 NMAC and projects exempt from regional emissions analysis as listed in Subsection B of 20.2.99.149 NMAC need not be explicitly considered):

(1) all facilities, services, and activities in the "baseline" scenario;

(2) completion of all TCMs and regionally significant projects (including facilities, services, and activities) specifically identified in the proposed transportation plan which will be operational or in effect in the analysis year, except that regulatory TCMs may not be assumed to begin at a future time unless the regulation is already adopted by the enforcing jurisdiction or the TCM is identified in the applicable implementation plan;

(3) all travel demand management programs and transportation system management activities known to the MPO, but not included in the applicable implementation plan or utilizing any federal funding or approval, which have been fully adopted and/or funded by the enforcing jurisdiction or sponsoring agency since the last conformity determination;

(4) the incremental effects of any travel demand management programs and transportation system management activities known to the MPO, but not included in the applicable implementation plan or utilizing any federal funding or approval, which were adopted and/or funded prior to the date of the last conformity determination, but which have been modified since then to be more stringent or effective;

(5) completion of all expected regionally significant highway and transit projects which are not from a conforming transportation plan and TIP; and

(6) completion of all expected regionally significant non-FHWA/FTA highway and transit projects that have clear funding sources and commitments leading toward their implementation and completion by the analysis year.

J. Projects not from a conforming transportation plan and TIP. For the regional emissions analysis required by Subsections B and E of 20.2.99.138 NMAC, if the project which is not from a conforming transportation plan and TIP is a modification of a project currently in the plan or TIP, the "baseline" scenario must include the project with its original design concept and scope, and the "action" scenario must include the project with its new design concept and scope.

N.M. Admin. Code § 20.2.99.138

12/14/94; 11/23/98; 20.2.99.138 NMAC - Rn, 20 NMAC 2.99.138 10/31/02; A, 10/15/05; A, 9/1/07; A, 06/01/09; A, 11/07/11