Summary: This section describes the documentation that will be required to demonstrate compliance with these Rules.
The Bureau or other reviewing entity will accept a proof of compliance by either a building cost analysis or "comparative" approach, or by using a "prescriptive" approach. To comply with this rule, one of the following methods of compliance must be utilized:
The demonstration should be conducted in accordance with the guidelines provided in Chapter 11, "Energy Cost Budget Method" of ASHRAE Standard 90.1 - 2001, in which the computer simulation program demonstrates compliance of the proposed design with this rule.
Guidelines for both approaches described in (A) and (B) above will be included in the E-Benchmarks handbook described in Section 11, above.
Life Cycle Analysis. Building designs submitted for review under the comparative approach method described in this chapter must include a life cycle cost analysis demonstrating that the life cycle cost of the proposed high efficiency building design is lower than the life cycle cost of the reference building designed in accordance with Title 10, Section 1415-D. Building designs submitted for review under this chapter and incorporating all applicable prescriptive measures specified in the Bureau of General Services' approved guidebook(s) are exempted from providing a separate life cycle cost analysis.
The submissions made pursuant to this section must be made during the early design development phase of the project, but no later than fifty-percent (50%) design development.
18- 554 C.M.R. ch. 60, § 21
September 18, 2004 - filing 2004-398
NON-SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES:
October 18, 2004 - spelling, punctuation and capitalizations only
STATUTORY AUTHORITY: 5 M.R.S.A. §1764-A