Current through Register Vol. 43, No. 49, December 5, 2024
Section 112-10-9a - Split samples(a) The animal health officer or assistant animal health officer shall determine, based upon the written standards of the official test laboratory, in their sole discretion whether there is sufficient quantity of each test sample to divide it into two portions for testing. If sufficient quantity of urine is not available for a split sample, the assistant animal health officer shall collect a blood sample for the purpose of providing a sample for the trainer pursuant to this rule. (b) If a test sample is divided into two portions for testing, no provision of these racing regulations shall prevent the commission or the executive director from ordering both test sample portions to be delivered to the official test laboratory for initial testing. (c) When the quantity of the test sample permits the splitting of the sample, each first portion shall be submitted by the commission to the official test laboratory for initial testing for prohibited substances. (d) When the quantity of the test sample permits and when the trainer or owner files a written request with the racing judges for the testing of a split sample, the commission shall submit the second portion of the test sample to a test laboratory approved by the commission. Each written request for the testing of a split sample shall be filed in the commission office at the racetrack facility within 48 hours after the trainer or owner receives notice of a positive report on a test sample taken from the horse. (e) Each person who requests testing of the second portion of a sample shall pay all costs for the transportation and testing of the sample. (f) The freezing, storage and safeguarding of each portion of a test sample shall remain the responsibility of the animal health officer and the assistant animal health officer. (g) The test results on the second portion of a sample shall not prevent disqualification of the horse. The results of the first test are prima facie evidence that the horse competed with the drug or medication in its system. (h) No provision of these racing regulations shall create vested procedural rights that may be relied upon by any licensee for the purpose of excluding testing evidence that is competent and probative. Kan. Admin. Regs. § 112-10-9a
Authorized by K.S.A. 1991 Supp. 74-8804, as amended by L. 1992, Ch. 27, Sec. 3, and L. 1992, Ch. 286, Sec. 2; implementing K.S.A. 1991 Supp. 74-8811; effective, T-112-8-13-92, Aug. 13, 1992; effective, T-112-12-10-92, Dec. 10, 1992; effective Feb. 15, 1993.