EXAMPLE 1. As of the beginning of the Amnesty Program Period, the Department is auditing Taxpayer for occupation and use taxes due for the periods July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2017. The audit will not be completed before the end of the Amnesty Program period. After consulting with the Department's auditor, Taxpayer estimates that it owes an additional Use Tax obligation of $300 for each of the months of July, August and September of 2016. During the Amnesty Program period, Taxpayer files amended returns and pays the additional $300 in tax for each month. After the audit is completed (including any proceedings in the Fast Track Resolution Program or before the Informal Conference Board) in 2021, the Department determines that, taking into account the $300 payments made during the Amnesty Program period, Taxpayer has overpaid its Use Tax obligation for July of 2016 by $150 and owes an additional $50 in Use Tax for August of 2016. As provided in subsection (k), Taxpayer may receive a refund of the overpayment for July of 2016. Also, if Taxpayer unsuccessfully contests any portion of the $50 underpayment after the conclusion of the audit, or fails to pay in full the $50 no later than the due date for payment of the demand for payment made by the Department, amnesty will be denied on the $300 amount paid during the Amnesty Program period with respect to August of 2016, as provided in subsection (j)(3). The abatement of penalties and interest with respect to the $300 paid for September of 2016 is not affected by any changes or proceedings related to the liabilities for July or August of 2016. The Department will offset the $50 in additional tax for August of 2016 against the overpayment for July of 2016 and allow a refund or credit of the remaining overpayment for July of 2016, to the extent the refund or credit is not otherwise barred. Taxpayer may also claim a refund or credit for some or all of the $50 additional tax for August of 2016, or for any other amount for July or August of 2016, providing the refund or credit would otherwise be allowable.
EXAMPLE 2: During an audit of Taxpayer's corporate income tax returns, the Department issued a Notice of Proposed Deficiency to Taxpayer, proposing deficiencies of $500 with respect to its 2015 liability and $800 with respect to 2016. Taxpayer timely requested review of both deficiencies by the Informal Conference Board under 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215.115, and the review had not been completed as of the beginning of the Amnesty Program period. Taxpayer decides to participate in the Amnesty Program by paying the entire $500 for 2015 in full, but only pays $600 for 2016 during the Amnesty Program period. After the Department receives the payment for 2015, penalties and interest related to the 2015 deficiency will be abated. The Informal Conference Board review and the remaining audit processes for 2016 will continue. If, at the conclusion of the audit, the Department determines that the 2016 deficiency was the $600 paid by Taxpayer during the Amnesty Program period, penalties and interest related to 2016 will be abated. If the Department determines that the 2016 deficiency was greater than the $600 paid by Taxpayer, amnesty will be denied for 2016, as provided in subsection (j)(3). If the Department determines that the 2016 deficiency was less than the $600 paid by Taxpayer, a refund or credit will be granted, providing the refund or credit would otherwise be allowable.
EXAMPLE 1: During the Amnesty Program period, Taxpayer files an amended Illinois income tax return reporting an estimated federal change liability of $10,000 it believes it will owe once an IRS audit of its 2017 federal income tax return is completed. When the IRS audit is completed in 2021, the changes determined by the IRS increase Taxpayer's Illinois income tax liability by an additional $1,000. If Taxpayer timely reports the $1,000 under IITA Section 506(b) and pays the tax and any related interest and penalties resulting from the federal change no later than 30 days after the Department has issued a notice and demand for payment, any interest and penalties abated as a result of the Taxpayer's participation in the Amnesty Program will remain abated. If, however, Taxpayer fails to timely report and pay the $1,000 or fails to pay any related interest or penalties within 30 days after the Department issues a notice and demand for payment, any Amnesty Program abatement interest and penalties related to Taxpayer's 2017 income tax liability will be forfeited, and those amounts will be deemed assessed and immediately collectible by the Department. If Taxpayer believes the interest or penalties in the notice and demand are incorrect for any reason, it may pay those amounts within 30 days after the issuance of the notice and demand and file a refund claim in order to contest those amounts without forfeiting the original abatement of interest or penalties.
EXAMPLE 2: An individual files his original income tax return for 2017 during the Amnesty Program period, and pays the full amount of tax reported on the return. The Department determines that the individual erroneously transcribed the amount of Illinois income tax withholding reported on his Form W-2, and issues a notice and demand for payment of the resulting underpayment, plus interest and penalty for late payment computed on the underpayment. If the individual pays the entire amount shown on the notice and demand by the due date for payment shown in the notice and demand, no penalty or interest will be imposed on the amount paid with the return.
EXAMPLE 1: On its Illinois income tax return for calendar 2017, Taxpayer claimed $2,000 in enterprise zone investment credits under IITA Section 203(f) that were earned in 2016 and carried forward to 2017 because Taxpayer had credits in excess of its liability for 2016. Taxpayer determines that, because of an error in computing its 2017 sales factor, it has underpaid its 2017 Illinois income tax liability by $1,000, and it pays that amount under the Amnesty Program. Taxpayer subsequently determines that it had failed to claim a subtraction for interest on federal obligations for 2016. Taking the subtraction reduces its pre-credit liability by $400 and increases its allowable enterprise zone investment credit carryover to 2017 by $400. No refund for 2017 is allowed, because the reduction in base income for 2016 is based on facts that were in existence as of the time the amnesty payment is made.
EXAMPLE 2: If, in Example 1, Taxpayer is an individual whose 2016 base income is reduced by a carryback to 2016 of a federal net operating loss incurred in calendar 2018, the refund from carrying forward the additional credit results from the fact of the 2018 loss, which was not in existence as of the time the amnesty payment is made, and the 2017 refund is allowable.
EXAMPLE 3: If Taxpayer in Example 1 receives a Schedule K-1-P from a partnership in 2020 reporting that Taxpayer was entitled to a credit for 2017 or for 2016 and the credit may be carried forward to 2017, and the credit had not previously been reported to Taxpayer, Taxpayer may claim a refund based on that credit.
EXAMPLE 4: On its Retailers' Occupation Tax return for January 2018, Taxpayer reports $1,000,000 in taxable gross receipts. During the Amnesty Program period, Taxpayer pays an established liability equal to the tax on an additional $50,000 in taxable receipts that had been included in an amended return filed after the conclusion of an audit. Taxpayer subsequently discovers that its records contain a resale certificate for a sale of $20,000 in January 2018, which it had erroneously reported as taxable. No refund is allowed in this instance, whether the $20,000 in receipts were included in the original return or only in the amended return, because the facts in existence as of the time the amnesty payment is made indicated that the receipts were not taxable.
EXAMPLE 5: If, subsequent to the end of the Amnesty Program period, one of the customers of the Taxpayer in Example 3 presents a resale certificate for a purchase made during January 2018 for which Taxpayer had collected Use Tax because no resale certificate had been provided at that time, Taxpayer may refund the Use Tax to the customer and claim a refund for its Retailers' Occupation Tax. The reduction in Taxpayer's liability results from a fact that was not in existence as of the time the amnesty payment is made.
EXAMPLE 6: On September 15, 2019, the Department issues a statement to Taxpayer indicating that it has an outstanding tax liability of $2,000. On September 20, 2019, the Department collects $300 of the liability by offsetting against it an overpayment of a different tax. If Taxpayer pays the entire $2,000 shown in the statement during the Amnesty Program period, the resulting $300 overpayment of the liability is not the result of an amnesty issue.
EXAMPLE 7: During the Amnesty Program period, Taxpayer files a return reporting an eligible liability. Due to an arithmetic error made in completing the return, Taxpayer reports an eligible liability of $2,530 rather than $2,350. The $180 overpayment resulting from this error is not the result of an amnesty issue. Similarly, if the return reported a $2,350 liability, but Taxpayer paid $2,530 with the return, the $180 overpayment is not the result of an amnesty issue.
EXAMPLE 1: Taxpayer's income tax return for the calendar year 2015 is under audit during the Amnesty Program period, but no established liability has been created. Taxpayer participates in the Amnesty Program for 2015. After the audit is concluded, the Department determines that Taxpayer has overpaid its 2015 liability by $300. Taxpayer may receive a refund of that $300, but no additional refund is allowable unless the additional refund results from issue that is not an amnesty issue or from the finalization of a federal change after the Amnesty period.
EXAMPLE 2: If Taxpayer in Example 1 also participates in the Amnesty Program for 2016, a year that is not under audit during the Amnesty Program period and for which there is no established liability, Taxpayer's participation in the Amnesty Program for 2015 does not limit Taxpayer's right to a refund for 2016.
Ill. Admin. Code tit. 86, § 520.105