EXAMPLE 1
Taxpayer, an individual whose taxable year is the calendar year, determines his or her required annual payment under subsection (d)(1) to be $13,648. Accordingly, the required installment under subsection (d)(1) for the 1st installment due April 15 of the taxable year equals $3,412 (i.e., 25% of $13,648). Taxpayer determines that his or her annualized income installment for that 1st installment period under this subsection (d)(2) is only $1,278. Accordingly, Taxpayer pays $1,278 as the required installment on April 15.
When Taxpayer determines the required installment for the 2nd installment due June 15, Taxpayer must increase the required installment determined under subsection (d)(1) by the excess of the required installment computed under that subsection for the 1st period over the annualized income installment for that period, or $2,134 (i.e., $3,412 - $1,278). Hence, the required installment computed under subsection (d)(1) for the 2nd installment due June 15 of the taxable year equals $5,546 (i.e., $3,412 + $2,134).
In determining the required installment due June 15, Taxpayer computes his or her annualized income installment for that period to be $1,660. Because the annualized income installment is less than the required installment for that period under subsection (d)(1) of $5,546, Taxpayer pays $1,660 as the required installment on June 15.
EXAMPLE 2
Assuming the same facts as in Example 1, when Taxpayer determines the required installment for the 3rd period due September 15, he or she must increase the required installment computed under subsection (d)(1) by $3,886, which is the excess of the required installment due on June 15 as computed in Example 1 over the annualized income installment for that period (i.e., $5,546 - $1,660). Hence, the required installment computed under subsection (d)(1) for the 3rd installment due September 15 is $7,298 (i.e., $3,412 + $3,886).
In determining his or her required installment due September 15, Taxpayer computes his or her annualized income installment for that period to be $3,414. Because the annualized income installment is less than the required installment for that period under subsection (d)(1) of $7,298, Taxpayer pays $3,414 as the required installment on September 15.
EXAMPLE 3
Assuming the same facts as in Example 2, when Taxpayer determines the required installment due January 15 of the next taxable year, he or she must increase the required installment computed under subsection (d)(1) by $3,884, which is the excess of the required installment for the 3rd installment period over the annualized income installment for that period (i.e., $7,298 - $3,414). Hence, the required installment under subsection (d)(1) for the installment due on January 15 is $7,296 (i.e., $3,412 + $3,884).
Installment | Applicable % |
1st | 22.5 % |
2nd | 45% |
3rd | 67.5 % |
4th | 90% |
EXAMPLE 4. Corporation uses a calendar taxable year and files its 2014 return on August 15, 2015. The return reports an overpayment of $50,000, and contains the election to apply the entire $50,000 against Corporation's 2015 estimated tax obligation. If Corporation was required to make a payment of $60,000 on the April 15, 2015 due date of the first installment for Corporation's 2015 estimated tax in order to avoid the penalty under IITA Section 804, the entire $50,000 will be treated as paid on April 15, 2015. If Corporation was required to make a payment of $20,000 on April 15, 2015 in order to avoid penalty under IITA Section 804, $20,000 of the overpayment will be treated as paid on April 15, 2015, and the remaining $30,000 shall be treated as paid on June 15, 2015, the due date of the second installment for Corporation's 2015 estimated tax, to the extent necessary to avoid or minimize the penalty under IITA Section 804. If the required payment for June 15, 2015 is also $20,000, $20,000 of the overpayment will be treated as paid on June 15, 2015, and the remaining $10,000 of the overpayment will be treated as paid on August 15, 2015, the date the return was filed.
EXAMPLE 5. Assume the same facts as in Example 4, except that Corporation had made a payment of $17,000 on July 1, 2015. Because the $17,000 payment was made after the unextended due date of the return, it cannot be applied to an estimated tax installment due before the payment was made. Accordingly, if Corporation was required to make a payment of $60,000 on each estimated tax installment due date in order to avoid overpayment, only $33,000 of the overpayment will be treated as paid on April 15, 2015, and the remaining $17,000 will be applied to the September 15, 2015 installment. If Corporation was required to make a payment of $20,000 on April 15, 2015 in order to avoid penalty under IITA Section 804, $20,000 of the overpayment will be treated as paid on April 15, 2015, and up to $13,000 shall be treated as paid on the June 15, 2015 due date, to the extent necessary to avoid or minimize the penalty under IITA Section 804, and any amount not applied to either of those installments will be applied to the September 15, 2015 installment.
EXAMPLE 6. Corporation uses a calendar taxable year and files an amended income tax return for 2012 on December 1, 2015, showing an overpayment as the result of a federal change. If Corporation elects to have the overpayment credited against its estimated tax obligation for any taxable year after 2012, the overpayment will be treated as a payment made on December 1, 2015.
Number of Required Installments | Applicable % |
4 | 22.5% |
3 | 30% |
2 | 45% |
1 | 90% |
X corporation uses a taxable year ending June 30. On January 15, 2011, X is acquired by a corporation using a calendar year, requiring X to terminate its June 30, 2011 year as of the acquisition date and then to use a taxable year beginning January 16, 2011 and ending December 31, 2011.
For its short taxable year ending January 15, 2011, X is required to make estimated tax payments on October 15 and December 15, 2010 and February 15, 2011. The applicable percentage of the total tax for the taxable year that is due with each installment is 30%.
If X bases its computation of its required payment on the tax due for the taxable year ending June 30, 2010, the tax due for that year is reduced by multiplying it by 199 (the number of days in the short taxable year ending January 15, 2011) and dividing the result by 365 (the number of days in the taxable year ending June 30, 2010).
Assuming the same facts as in Example 4, for its short taxable year ending December 31, 2011, X corporation is required to make estimated tax payments on May 16, July 15 and October 17, 2011, because the period from January 16 through January 31, 2011, is disregarded in determining when an installment is due. Because the taxable year terminates before the15th day of the 12th month of the taxable year, when the 4th installment would normally be due, the 4th installment is due on December 15, 2011. Because its taxable year ending January 15, 2011 is not a 12-month taxable year, X corporation cannot compute its required annual installment for its short taxable year ending December 31, 2011 using the tax shown on its return for the previous taxable year under subsection (d)(2)(A)(ii).
Individuals | $250 (for tax years ending before 12/31/01) |
$500 (for tax years ending on or after 12/31/01) | |
Corporations | $400 |
EXAMPLE 9
P.A. 93-840 disallows certain subtractions allowed under prior law. P.A. 93-840 did not become law until July 30, 2004, but applies to tax years ending on or after December 31, 2004. A calendar-year taxpayer who, on or before June 15, 2004, had paid the estimated tax due under subsection (d)(2), computed by allowing the subtractions subsequently disallowed by P.A. 93-840, shall not be subject to penalty under IITA Section 804 with respect to the installment due on June 15, 2004.
EXAMPLE 10
The research and development credit allowed under IITA Section 201(k) was repealed by P.A. 93-29 (effective June 20, 2003) for tax years ending on and after December 31, 2003, and an identical research and development credit was enacted in IITA Section 201(k) by P.A. 93-840 (effective July 30, 2004). A calendar-year taxpayer would not be subject to penalty under IITA Section 804 with respect to the installment of estimated tax due on June 15, 2003 if, on or before June 15, 2003, the taxpayer had the estimated tax due under subsection (d)(2) computed by allowing the research and development credit. However, in computing the estimated tax due under subsection (d)(2) for the June 15, 2004 installment, the taxpayer may not claim a research and development credit.
Ill. Admin. Code tit. 86, § 100.8010
Added at 34 Ill. Reg. 12891, effective August 19, 2010