In this example, a joint employer relationship is not formed. Trucking Company hires, assigns, disciplines, and dismisses drivers. Supplier and Trucking Company are independent business entities that do not have any common ownership or shared management. The drivers provide work that is a benefit to the Supplier, but it is not an integral part of its business. Supplier has no direct or indirect control over the terms and conditions of the driver's work, in that it does not dictate the driver's routes or daily schedules.
In this example, a joint employer relationship is formed between all the parties. While Staffing Agency hires and pays the workers, Company A exerts substantial control over the workers, provides training, equipment, and materials, can remove the workers from the work site, and exerts control over worker schedules and provides assignments. Company A and B supervise the workers. The workers have been continuously employed at Company A's warehouse regardless of the intermediaries. The work performed by the workers is for the benefit of Company A.
In this example, a joint employer relationship is formed. The facts that Company A is incorporated separately from Company B and that each company pays the workers from separate accounts do not insulate them from the joint employer relationship. Here, Company A and Company B share common ownership. The companies share workers, share equipment, coordinate employee schedules, assignments, and determine what crew workers will be on. Functionally, they operate as joint employers.
The General Contractor for a large building construction project has engaged various subcontractors to complete certain aspects of the job.
In this example, a joint employer relationship is formed. The workers perform work solely on the General Contractor's job site and for the General Contractor's benefit. While both the General Contractor and Subcontractor A control the supervision and quality of work, General Contractor maintains all other authority over the project. General Contractor has assumed direct control of the assigning workers to the job site. General Contractor makes the daily work schedule, directs the workers as to the work they are to complete, and the workers are assigned to this project for the duration of the project, making them an integral part of the job. The General Contractor can take disciplinary action by removing workers from the worksite.
In this example, a joint employer relationship is not formed. While the electrical work performed benefits the General Contractor, it also benefits Subcontractor B's electrical business. Subcontractor B and the General Contractor are separate business entities. Subcontractor B hires, directs, assigns, and supervises the work of the electricians. General Contractor has no responsibility for the assignment or supervision of the work. General Contractor and Subcontractor B coordinate general scheduling to accommodate the flow of work being done, but the electricians are directed, assigned and scheduled to the project by Subcontractor B. Subcontractor B supplies the equipment, tools, and materials for the job, and is responsible for the quality of the electricians' work. Additionally, Subcontractor B is not economically dependent on the General Contractor, as the electricians are sent to other job sites indicating this project is only one of many for Subcontractor B.
In this example, a joint employer relationship is formed. Security Company and Hospital share direct control over the guards. The Hospital's Chief of Security has significant control and oversight in assignment, supervision, and performance issues, including discipline and termination. Additionally, there is an element of economic dependence as Hospital is Security Company's biggest client, which suggests additional control by the Hospital of the Security Company.
In this example, a joint employer relationship is formed between Home Care Agency, Customer, and Customer's wife. Here, Home Care Worker's wages are paid by Home Care Agency and Home Care Agency controls the rate of pay and the method of payment. Customer is invoiced by Home Care Agency. Home Care Agency, Customer, and Customer's wife exercise considerable control over the structure and conditions of Home Care Worker's employment by determining the hours of work and what tasks are to be performed. Customer's wife can raise issues with Home Care Worker's performance with Home Care Agency. Home Care Agency intervenes in issues between Home Care Worker and Customer and/or Customer's wife.
Ill. Admin. Code tit. 56, § 210.115