29 C.F.R. § 1910.95
Equivalent sound level contours. Octave band sound pressure levels may be converted to the equivalent A-weighted sound level by plotting them on this graph and noting the A-weighted sound level corresponding to the point of highest penetration into the sound level contours. This equivalent A-weighted sound level, which may differ from the actual A-weighted sound level of the noise, is used to determine exposure limits from Table 1.G-16.
Table G-16-Permissible Noise Exposures1
| Duration per day, hours | Sound level dBA slow response |
| 8 | 90 |
| 6 | 92 |
| 4 | 95 |
| 3 | 97 |
| 2 | 100 |
| 11/2 | 102 |
| 1 | 105 |
| 1/2 | 110 |
| 1/4 or less | 115 |
1 When the daily noise exposure is composed of two or more periods of noise exposure of different levels, their combined effect should be considered, rather than the individual effect of each. If the sum of the following fractions: C1/T1 + C2/T2Cn/ Tn exceeds unity, then, the mixed exposure should be considered to exceed the limit value. Cn indicates the total time of exposure at a specified noise level, and Tn indicates the total time of exposure permitted at that level.
Exposure to impulsive or impact noise should not exceed 140 dB peak sound pressure level.
Appendix A to § 1910.95 -Noise Exposure Computation
This appendix is Mandatory
I. Computation of Employee Noise Exposure
(1) Noise dose is computed using Table G-16a as follows:
(i) When the sound level, L, is constant over the entire work shift, the noise dose, D, in percent, is given by: D = 100 C/T where C is the total length of the work day, in hours, and T is the reference duration corresponding to the measured sound level, L, as given in Table G-16a or by the formula shown as a footnote to that table.
(ii) When the workshift noise exposure is composed of two or more periods of noise at different levels, the total noise dose over the work day is given by:
D = 100(C1 / T1 + C2 / T2 + Cn / Tn),
where Cn indicates the total time of exposure at a specific noise level, and Tn indicates the reference duration for that level as given by Table G-16a.
(2) The eight-hour time-weighted average sound level (TWA), in decibels, may be computed from the dose, in percent, by means of the formula: TWA = 16.61 log10 (D/100) + 90. For an eight-hour workshift with the noise level constant over the entire shift, the TWA is equal to the measured sound level.
(3) A table relating dose and TWA is given in Section II.
Table G-16a
| A-weighted sound level, L (decibel) | Reference duration, T (hour) |
| 80 | 32 |
| 81 | 27.9 |
| 82 | 24.3 |
| 83 | 21.1 |
| 84 | 18.4 |
| 85 | 16 |
| 86 | 13.9 |
| 87 | 12.1 |
| 88 | 10.6 |
| 89 | 9.2 |
| 90 | 8 |
| 91 | 7.0 |
| 92 | 6.1 |
| 93 | 5.3 |
| 94 | 4.6 |
| 95 | 4 |
| 96 | 3.5 |
| 97 | 3.0 |
| 98 | 2.6 |
| 99 | 2.3 |
| 100 | 2 |
| 101 | 1.7 |
| 102 | 1.5 |
| 103 | 1.3 |
| 104 | 1.1 |
| 105 | 1 |
| 106 | 0.87 |
| 107 | 0.76 |
| 108 | 0.66 |
| 109 | 0.57 |
| 110 | 0.5 |
| 111 | 0.44 |
| 112 | 0.38 |
| 113 | 0.33 |
| 114 | 0.29 |
| 115 | 0.25 |
| 116 | 0.22 |
| 117 | 0.19 |
| 118 | 0.16 |
| 119 | 0.14 |
| 120 | 0.125 |
| 121 | 0.11 |
| 122 | 0.095 |
| 123 | 0.082 |
| 124 | 0.072 |
| 125 | 0.063 |
| 126 | 0.054 |
| 127 | 0.047 |
| 128 | 0.041 |
| 129 | 0.036 |
| 130 | 0.031 |
In the above table the reference duration, T, is computed by
where L is the measured A-weighted sound level.
II. Conversion Between "Dose" and "8-Hour Time-Weighted Average" Sound Level
Compliance with paragraphs (c)-(r) of this regulation is determined by the amount of exposure to noise in the workplace. The amount of such exposure is usually measured with an audiodosimeter which gives a readout in terms of "dose." In order to better understand the requirements of the amendment, dosimeter readings can be converted to an "8-hour time-weighted average sound level." (TWA).
In order to convert the reading of a dosimeter into TWA, see Table A-1, below. This table applies to dosimeters that are set by the manufacturer to calculate dose or percent exposure according to the relationships in Table G-16a. So, for example, a dose of 91 percent over an eight hour day results in a TWA of 89.3 dB, and, a dose of 50 percent corresponds to a TWA of 85 dB.
If the dose as read on the dosimeter is less than or greater than the values found in Table A-1, the TWA may be calculated by using the formula: TWA=16.61 log10 (D/100) + 90 where TWA = 8-hour time-weighted average sound level and D = accumulated dose in percent exposure.
Table A-1-Conversion From "Percent Noise Exposure" or "Dose" to "8-Hour Time-Weighted Average Sound Level" (TWA)
| Dose or percent noise exposure | TWA |
| 10 | 73.4 |
| 15 | 76.3 |
| 20 | 78.4 |
| 25 | 80.0 |
| 30 | 81.3 |
| 35 | 82.4 |
| 40 | 83.4 |
| 45 | 84.2 |
| 50 | 85.0 |
| 55 | 85.7 |
| 60 | 86.3 |
| 65 | 86.9 |
| 70 | 87.4 |
| 75 | 87.9 |
| 80 | 88.4 |
| 81 | 88.5 |
| 82 | 88.6 |
| 83 | 88.7 |
| 84 | 88.7 |
| 85 | 88.8 |
| 86 | 88.9 |
| 87 | 89.0 |
| 88 | 89.1 |
| 89 | 89.2 |
| 90 | 89.2 |
| 91 | 89.3 |
| 92 | 89.4 |
| 93 | 89.5 |
| 94 | 89.6 |
| 95 | 89.6 |
| 96 | 89.7 |
| 97 | 89.8 |
| 98 | 89.9 |
| 99 | 89.9 |
| 100 | 90.0 |
| 101 | 90.1 |
| 102 | 90.1 |
| 103 | 90.2 |
| 104 | 90.3 |
| 105 | 90.4 |
| 106 | 90.4 |
| 107 | 90.5 |
| 108 | 90.6 |
| 109 | 90.6 |
| 110 | 90.7 |
| 111 | 90.8 |
| 112 | 90.8 |
| 113 | 90.9 |
| 114 | 90.9 |
| 115 | 91.1 |
| 116 | 91.1 |
| 117 | 91.1 |
| 118 | 91.2 |
| 119 | 91.3 |
| 120 | 91.3 |
| 125 | 91.6 |
| 130 | 91.9 |
| 135 | 92.2 |
| 140 | 92.4 |
| 145 | 92.7 |
| 150 | 92.9 |
| 155 | 93.2 |
| 160 | 93.4 |
| 165 | 93.6 |
| 170 | 93.8 |
| 175 | 94.0 |
| 180 | 94.2 |
| 185 | 94.4 |
| 190 | 94.6 |
| 195 | 94.8 |
| 200 | 95.0 |
| 210 | 95.4 |
| 220 | 95.7 |
| 230 | 96.0 |
| 240 | 96.3 |
| 250 | 96.6 |
| 260 | 96.9 |
| 270 | 97.2 |
| 280 | 97.4 |
| 290 | 97.7 |
| 300 | 97.9 |
| 310 | 98.2 |
| 320 | 98.4 |
| 330 | 98.6 |
| 340 | 98.8 |
| 350 | 99.0 |
| 360 | 99.2 |
| 370 | 99.4 |
| 380 | 99.6 |
| 390 | 99.8 |
| 400 | 100.0 |
| 410 | 100.2 |
| 420 | 100.4 |
| 430 | 100.5 |
| 440 | 100.7 |
| 450 | 100.8 |
| 460 | 101.0 |
| 470 | 101.2 |
| 480 | 101.3 |
| 490 | 101.5 |
| 500 | 101.6 |
| 510 | 101.8 |
| 520 | 101.9 |
| 530 | 102.0 |
| 540 | 102.2 |
| 550 | 102.3 |
| 560 | 102.4 |
| 570 | 102.6 |
| 580 | 102.7 |
| 590 | 102.8 |
| 600 | 102.9 |
| 610 | 103.0 |
| 620 | 103.2 |
| 630 | 103.3 |
| 640 | 103.4 |
| 650 | 103.5 |
| 660 | 103.6 |
| 670 | 103.7 |
| 680 | 103.8 |
| 690 | 103.9 |
| 700 | 104.0 |
| 710 | 104.1 |
| 720 | 104.2 |
| 730 | 104.3 |
| 740 | 104.4 |
| 750 | 104.5 |
| 760 | 104.6 |
| 770 | 104.7 |
| 780 | 104.8 |
| 790 | 104.9 |
| 800 | 105.0 |
| 810 | 105.1 |
| 820 | 105.2 |
| 830 | 105.3 |
| 840 | 105.4 |
| 850 | 105.4 |
| 860 | 105.5 |
| 870 | 105.6 |
| 880 | 105.7 |
| 890 | 105.8 |
| 900 | 105.8 |
| 910 | 105.9 |
| 920 | 106.0 |
| 930 | 106.1 |
| 940 | 106.2 |
| 950 | 106.2 |
| 960 | 106.3 |
| 970 | 106.4 |
| 980 | 106.5 |
| 990 | 106.5 |
| 999 | 106.6 |
Appendix B to § 1910.95 -Methods for Estimating the Adequacy of Hearing Protector Attenuation
This appendix is Mandatory
For employees who have experienced a significant threshold shift, hearing protector attenuation must be sufficient to reduce employee exposure to a TWA of 85 dB. Employers must select one of the following methods by which to estimate the adequacy of hearing protector attenuation.
The most convenient method is the Noise Reduction Rating (NRR) developed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). According to EPA regulation, the NRR must be shown on the hearing protector package. The NRR is then related to an individual worker's noise environment in order to assess the adequacy of the attenuation of a given hearing protector. This appendix describes four methods of using the NRR to determine whether a particular hearing protector provides adequate protection within a given exposure environment. Selection among the four procedures is dependent upon the employer's noise measuring instruments.
Instead of using the NRR, employers may evaluate the adequacy of hearing protector attenuation by using one of the three methods developed by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), which are described in the "List of Personal Hearing Protectors and Attenuation Data," HEW Publication No. 76-120, 1975, pages 21-37. These methods are known as NIOSH methods #1B1, #1B2 and #1B3. The NRR described below is a simplification of NIOSH method #1B2. The most complex method is NIOSH method #1B1, which is probably the most accurate method since it uses the largest amount of spectral information from the individual employee's noise environment. As in the case of the NRR method described below, if one of the NIOSH methods is used, the selected method must be applied to an individual's noise environment to assess the adequacy of the attenuation. Employers should be careful to take a sufficient number of measurements in order to achieve a representative sample for each time segment.
Note: The employer must remember that calculated attenuation values reflect realistic values only to the extent that the protectors are properly fitted and worn.
When using the NRR to assess hearing protector adequacy, one of the following methods must be used:
(i) When using a dosimeter that is capable of C-weighted measurements:
(A) Obtain the employee's C-weighted dose for the entire workshift, and convert to TWA (see appendix A, II).
(B) Subtract the NRR from the C-weighted TWA to obtain the estimated A-weighted TWA under the ear protector.
(ii) When using a dosimeter that is not capable of C-weighted measurements, the following method may be used:
(A) Convert the A-weighted dose to TWA (see appendix A).
(B) Subtract 7 dB from the NRR.
(C) Subtract the remainder from the A-weighted TWA to obtain the estimated A-weighted TWA under the ear protector.
(iii) When using a sound level meter set to the A-weighting network:
(A) Obtain the employee's A-weighted TWA.
(B) Subtract 7 dB from the NRR, and subtract the remainder from the A-weighted TWA to obtain the estimated A-weighted TWA under the ear protector.
(iv) When using a sound level meter set on the C-weighting network:
(A) Obtain a representative sample of the C-weighted sound levels in the employee's environment.
(B) Subtract the NRR from the C-weighted average sound level to obtain the estimated A-weighted TWA under the ear protector.
(v) When using area monitoring procedures and a sound level meter set to the A-weighing network.
(A) Obtain a representative sound level for the area in question.
(B) Subtract 7 dB from the NRR and subtract the remainder from the A-weighted sound level for that area.
(vi) When using area monitoring procedures and a sound level meter set to the C-weighting network:
(A) Obtain a representative sound level for the area in question.
(B) Subtract the NRR from the C-weighted sound level for that area.
Appendix C to § 1910.95 -Audiometric Measuring Instruments
This appendix is Mandatory
1. In the event that pulsed-tone audiometers are used, they shall have a tone on-time of at least 200 milliseconds.
2. Self-recording audiometers shall comply with the following requirements:
(A) The chart upon which the audiogram is traced shall have lines at positions corresponding to all multiples of 10 dB hearing level within the intensity range spanned by the audiometer. The lines shall be equally spaced and shall be separated by at least 1/4 inch. Additional increments are optional. The audiogram pen tracings shall not exceed 2 dB in width.
(B) It shall be possible to set the stylus manually at the 10-dB increment lines for calibration purposes.
(C) The slewing rate for the audiometer attenuator shall not be more than 6 dB/sec except that an initial slewing rate greater than 6 dB/sec is permitted at the beginning of each new test frequency, but only until the second subject response.
(D) The audiometer shall remain at each required test frequency for 30 seconds (±3 seconds). The audiogram shall be clearly marked at each change of frequency and the actual frequency change of the audiometer shall not deviate from the frequency boundaries marked on the audiogram by more than ±3 seconds.
(E) It must be possible at each test frequency to place a horizontal line segment parallel to the time axis on the audiogram, such that the audiometric tracing crosses the line segment at least six times at that test frequency. At each test frequency the threshold shall be the average of the midpoints of the tracing excursions.
Appendix D to § 1910.95 -Audiometric Test Rooms
This appendix is Mandatory
Rooms used for audiometric testing shall not have background sound pressure levels exceeding those in Table D-1 when measured by equipment conforming at least to the Type 2 requirements of American National Standard Specification for Sound Level Meters, S1.4-1971 (R1976), and to the Class II requirements of American National Standard Specification for Octave, Half-Octave, and Third-Octave Band Filter Sets, S1.11-1971 (R1976).
Table D-1-Maximum Allowable Octave-Band Sound Pressure Levels for Audiometric Test Rooms
| Octave-band center frequency (Hz) | 500 | 1000 | 2000 | 4000 | 8000 |
| Sound pressure level (dB) | 40 | 40 | 47 | 57 | 62 |
Appendix E to § 1910.95 -Acoustic Calibration of Audiometers
This appendix is Mandatory
Audiometer calibration shall be checked acoustically, at least annually, according to the procedures described in this appendix. The equipment necessary to perform these measurements is a sound level meter, octave-band filter set, and a National Bureau of Standards 9A coupler. In making these measurements, the accuracy of the calibrating equipment shall be sufficient to determine that the audiometer is within the tolerances permitted by American Standard Specification for Audiometers, S3.6-1969.
(1) Sound Pressure Output Check
A. Place the earphone coupler over the microphone of the sound level meter and place the earphone on the coupler.
B. Set the audiometer's hearing threshold level (HTL) dial to 70 dB.
C. Measure the sound pressure level of the tones at each test frequency from 500 Hz through 6000 Hz for each earphone.
D. At each frequency the readout on the sound level meter should correspond to the levels in Table E-1 or Table E-2, as appropriate, for the type of earphone, in the column entitled "sound level meter reading."
(2) Linearity Check
A. With the earphone in place, set the frequency to 1000 Hz and the HTL dial on the audiometer to 70 dB.
B. Measure the sound levels in the coupler at each 10-dB decrement from 70 dB to 10 dB, noting the sound level meter reading at each setting.
C. For each 10-dB decrement on the audiometer the sound level meter should indicate a corresponding 10 dB decrease.
D. This measurement may be made electrically with a voltmeter connected to the earphone terminals.
(3) Tolerances
When any of the measured sound levels deviate from the levels in Table E-1 or Table E-2 by ±3 dB at any test frequency between 500 and 3000 Hz, 4 dB at 4000 Hz, or 5 dB at 6000 Hz, an exhaustive calibration is advised. An exhaustive calibration is required if the deviations are greater than 15 dB or greater at any test frequency.
Table E-1-Reference Threshold Levels for Telephonics-TDH-39 Earphones
| Frequency, Hz | Reference threshold level for TDH-39 earphones, dB | Sound level meter reading, dB |
| 500 | 11.5 | 81.5 |
| 1000 | 7 | 77 |
| 2000 | 9 | 79 |
| 3000 | 10 | 80 |
| 4000 | 9.5 | 79.5 |
| 6000 | 15.5 | 85.5 |
Table E-2-Reference Threshold Levels for Telephonics-TDH-49 Earphones
| Frequency, Hz | Reference threshold level for TDH-49 earphones, dB | Sound level meter reading, dB |
| 500 | 13.5 | 83.5 |
| 1000 | 7.5 | 77.5 |
| 2000 | 11 | 81.0 |
| 3000 | 9.5 | 79.5 |
| 4000 | 10.5 | 80.5 |
| 6000 | 13.5 | 83.5 |
Appendix F to § 1910.95 -Calculations and Application of Age Corrections to Audiograms
This appendix Is Non-Mandatory
In determining whether a standard threshold shift has occurred, allowance may be made for the contribution of aging to the change in hearing level by adjusting the most recent audiogram. If the employer chooses to adjust the audiogram, the employer shall follow the procedure described below. This procedure and the age correction tables were developed by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health in the criteria document entitled "Criteria for a Recommended Standard . . . Occupational Exposure to Noise," ((HSM)-11001).
For each audiometric test frequency;
(i) Determine from Tables F-1 or F-2 the age correction values for the employee by:
(A) Finding the age at which the most recent audiogram was taken and recording the corresponding values of age corrections at 1000 Hz through 6000 Hz;
(B) Finding the age at which the baseline audiogram was taken and recording the corresponding values of age corrections at 1000 Hz through 6000 Hz.
(ii) Subtract the values found in step (i)(B) from the value found in step (i)(A).
(iii) The differences calculated in step (ii) represented that portion of the change in hearing that may be due to aging.
Example: Employee is a 32-year-old male. The audiometric history for his right ear is shown in decibels below.
| Employee's age | Audiometric test frequency (Hz) | ||||
| 1000 | 2000 | 3000 | 4000 | 6000 | |
| 26 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 5 |
| *27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 5 |
| 29 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 15 | 5 |
| 30 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 20 | 10 |
| 31 | 5 | 10 | 20 | 15 | 15 |
| *32 | 5 | 10 | 10 | 25 | 20 |
The audiogram at age 27 is considered the baseline since it shows the best hearing threshold levels. Asterisks have been used to identify the baseline and most recent audiogram. A threshold shift of 20 dB exists at 4000 Hz between the audiograms taken at ages 27 and 32.
(The threshold shift is computed by subtracting the hearing threshold at age 27, which was 5, from the hearing threshold at age 32, which is 25). A retest audiogram has confirmed this shift. The contribution of aging to this change in hearing may be estimated in the following manner:
Go to Table F-1 and find the age correction values (in dB) for 4000 Hz at age 27 and age 32.
| Frequency (Hz) | |||||
| 1000 | 2000 | 3000 | 4000 | 6000 | |
| Age 32 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 10 | 14 |
| Age 27 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 11 |
| Difference | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 |
The difference represents the amount of hearing loss that may be attributed to aging in the time period between the baseline audiogram and the most recent audiogram. In this example, the difference at 4000 Hz is 3 dB. This value is subtracted from the hearing level at 4000 Hz, which in the most recent audiogram is 25, yielding 22 after adjustment. Then the hearing threshold in the baseline audiogram at 4000 Hz (5) is subtracted from the adjusted annual audiogram hearing threshold at 4000 Hz (22). Thus the age-corrected threshold shift would be 17 dB (as opposed to a threshold shift of 20 dB without age correction).
Table F-1-Age Correction Values in Decibels for Males
| Years | Audiometric Test Frequencies (Hz) | ||||
| 1000 | 2000 | 3000 | 4000 | 6000 | |
| 20 or younger | 5 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 8 |
| 21 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 8 |
| 22 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 8 |
| 23 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 9 |
| 24 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 9 |
| 25 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 10 |
| 26 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 10 |
| 27 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 11 |
| 28 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 11 |
| 29 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 12 |
| 30 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 9 | 12 |
| 31 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 9 | 13 |
| 32 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 10 | 14 |
| 33 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 10 | 14 |
| 34 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 11 | 15 |
| 35 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 11 | 15 |
| 36 | 7 | 5 | 9 | 12 | 16 |
| 37 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 12 | 17 |
| 38 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 13 | 17 |
| 39 | 7 | 6 | 10 | 14 | 18 |
| 40 | 7 | 6 | 10 | 14 | 19 |
| 41 | 7 | 6 | 10 | 14 | 20 |
| 42 | 8 | 7 | 11 | 16 | 20 |
| 43 | 8 | 7 | 12 | 16 | 21 |
| 44 | 8 | 7 | 12 | 17 | 22 |
| 45 | 8 | 7 | 13 | 18 | 23 |
| 46 | 8 | 8 | 13 | 19 | 24 |
| 47 | 8 | 8 | 14 | 19 | 24 |
| 48 | 9 | 8 | 14 | 20 | 25 |
| 49 | 9 | 9 | 15 | 21 | 26 |
| 50 | 9 | 9 | 16 | 22 | 27 |
| 51 | 9 | 9 | 16 | 23 | 28 |
| 52 | 9 | 10 | 17 | 24 | 29 |
| 53 | 9 | 10 | 18 | 25 | 30 |
| 54 | 10 | 10 | 18 | 26 | 31 |
| 55 | 10 | 11 | 19 | 27 | 32 |
| 56 | 10 | 11 | 20 | 28 | 34 |
| 57 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 29 | 35 |
| 58 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 31 | 36 |
| 59 | 11 | 12 | 22 | 32 | 37 |
| 60 or older | 11 | 13 | 23 | 33 | 38 |
Table F-2-Age Correction Values in Decibels for Females
| Years | Audiometric Test Frequencies (Hz) | ||||
| 1000 | 2000 | 3000 | 4000 | 6000 | |
| 20 or younger | 7 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| 21 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 6 |
| 22 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| 23 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 7 |
| 24 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 7 |
| 25 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 7 |
| 26 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 8 |
| 27 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 |
| 28 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 |
| 29 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 9 |
| 30 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 9 |
| 31 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 9 |
| 32 | 9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 10 |
| 33 | 9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 10 |
| 34 | 9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 10 |
| 35 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 11 |
| 36 | 9 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 11 |
| 37 | 9 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 12 |
| 38 | 10 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 12 |
| 39 | 10 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 12 |
| 40 | 10 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 13 |
| 41 | 10 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 13 |
| 42 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 13 |
| 43 | 11 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 14 |
| 44 | 11 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 14 |
| 45 | 11 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 15 |
| 46 | 11 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 15 |
| 47 | 11 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 16 |
| 48 | 12 | 9 | 11 | 11 | 16 |
| 49 | 12 | 9 | 11 | 11 | 16 |
| 50 | 12 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 17 |
| 51 | 12 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 17 |
| 52 | 12 | 10 | 12 | 13 | 18 |
| 53 | 13 | 10 | 13 | 13 | 18 |
| 54 | 13 | 11 | 13 | 14 | 19 |
| 55 | 13 | 11 | 14 | 14 | 19 |
| 56 | 13 | 11 | 14 | 15 | 20 |
| 57 | 13 | 11 | 15 | 15 | 20 |
| 58 | 14 | 12 | 15 | 16 | 21 |
| 59 | 14 | 12 | 16 | 16 | 21 |
| 60 or older | 14 | 12 | 16 | 17 | 22 |
Appendix G to § 1910.95 -Monitoring Noise Levels Non-Mandatory Informational Appendix
This appendix provides information to help employers comply with the noise monitoring obligations that are part of the hearing conservation amendment.
WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF NOISE MONITORING?
This revised amendment requires that employees be placed in a hearing conservation program if they are exposed to average noise levels of 85 dB or greater during an 8 hour workday. In order to determine if exposures are at or above this level, it may be necessary to measure or monitor the actual noise levels in the workplace and to estimate the noise exposure or "dose" received by employees during the workday.
WHEN IS IT NECESSARY TO IMPLEMENT A NOISE MONITORING PROGRAM?
It is not necessary for every employer to measure workplace noise. Noise monitoring or measuring must be conducted only when exposures are at or above 85 dB. Factors which suggest that noise exposures in the workplace may be at this level include employee complaints about the loudness of noise, indications that employees are losing their hearing, or noisy conditions which make normal conversation difficult. The employer should also consider any information available regarding noise emitted from specific machines. In addition, actual workplace noise measurements can suggest whether or not a monitoring program should be initiated.
HOW IS NOISE MEASURED?
Basically, there are two different instruments to measure noise exposures: the sound level meter and the dosimeter. A sound level meter is a device that measures the intensity of sound at a given moment. Since sound level meters provide a measure of sound intensity at only one point in time, it is generally necessary to take a number of measurements at different times during the day to estimate noise exposure over a workday. If noise levels fluctuate, the amount of time noise remains at each of the various measured levels must be determined.
To estimate employee noise exposures with a sound level meter it is also generally necessary to take several measurements at different locations within the workplace. After appropriate sound level meter readings are obtained, people sometimes draw "maps" of the sound levels within different areas of the workplace. By using a sound level "map" and information on employee locations throughout the day, estimates of individual exposure levels can be developed. This measurement method is generally referred to as area noise monitoring.
A dosimeter is like a sound level meter except that it stores sound level measurements and integrates these measurements over time, providing an average noise exposure reading for a given period of time, such as an 8-hour workday. With a dosimeter, a microphone is attached to the employee's clothing and the exposure measurement is simply read at the end of the desired time period. A reader may be used to read-out the dosimeter's measurements. Since the dosimeter is worn by the employee, it measures noise levels in those locations in which the employee travels. A sound level meter can also be positioned within the immediate vicinity of the exposed worker to obtain an individual exposure estimate. Such procedures are generally referred to as personal noise monitoring.
Area monitoring can be used to estimate noise exposure when the noise levels are relatively constant and employees are not mobile. In workplaces where employees move about in different areas or where the noise intensity tends to fluctuate over time, noise exposure is generally more accurately estimated by the personal monitoring approach.
In situations where personal monitoring is appropriate, proper positioning of the microphone is necessary to obtain accurate measurements. With a dosimeter, the microphone is generally located on the shoulder and remains in that position for the entire workday. With a sound level meter, the microphone is stationed near the employee's head, and the instrument is usually held by an individual who follows the employee as he or she moves about.
Manufacturer's instructions, contained in dosimeter and sound level meter operating manuals, should be followed for calibration and maintenance. To ensure accurate results, it is considered good professional practice to calibrate instruments before and after each use.
HOW OFTEN IS IT NECESSARY TO MONITOR NOISE LEVELS?
The amendment requires that when there are significant changes in machinery or production processes that may result in increased noise levels, remonitoring must be conducted to determine whether additional employees need to be included in the hearing conservation program. Many companies choose to remonitor periodically (once every year or two) to ensure that all exposed employees are included in their hearing conservation programs.
WHERE CAN EQUIPMENT AND TECHNICAL ADVICE BE OBTAINED?
Noise monitoring equipment may be either purchased or rented. Sound level meters cost about $500 to $1,000, while dosimeters range in price from about $750 to $1,500. Smaller companies may find it more economical to rent equipment rather than to purchase it. Names of equipment suppliers may be found in the telephone book (Yellow Pages) under headings such as: "Safety Equipment," "Industrial Hygiene," or "Engineers-Acoustical." In addition to providing information on obtaining noise monitoring equipment, many companies and individuals included under such listings can provide professional advice on how to conduct a valid noise monitoring program. Some audiological testing firms and industrial hygiene firms also provide noise monitoring services. Universities with audiology, industrial hygiene, or acoustical engineering departments may also provide information or may be able to help employers meet their obligations under this amendment.
Free, on-site assistance may be obtained from OSHA-supported state and private consultation organizations. These safety and health consultative entities generally give priority to the needs of small businesses.
Appendix H to § 1910.95 -Availability of Referenced Documents
Paragraphs (c) through (o) of 29 CFR 1910.95 and the accompanying appendices contain provisions which incorporate publications by reference. Generally, the publications provide criteria for instruments to be used in monitoring and audiometric testing. These criteria are intended to be mandatory when so indicated in the applicable paragraphs of § 1910.95 and appendices.
It should be noted that OSHA does not require that employers purchase a copy of the referenced publications. Employers, however, may desire to obtain a copy of the referenced publications for their own information.
The designation of the paragraph of the standard in which the referenced publications appear, the titles of the publications, and the availability of the publications are as follows:
| Paragraph designation | Referenced publication | Available from- |
| Appendix B | "List of Personal Hearing Protectors and Attenuation Data," HEW Pub. No. 76-120, 1975. NTIS-PB267461 | National Technical Information Service, Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161. |
| Appendix D | "Specification for Sound Level Meters," S1.4-1971 (R1976) | American National Standards Institute, Inc., 1430 Broadway, New York, NY 10018. |
| § 1910.95(k)(2) , appendix E | "Specifications for Audiometers," S3.6-1969 | American National Standards Institute, Inc., 1430 Broadway, New York, NY 10018. |
| Appendix D | "Specification for Octave, Half-Octave and Third-Octave Band Filter Sets," S1.11-1971 (R1976) | Back Numbers Department, Dept. STD, American Institute of Physics, 333 E. 45th St., New York, NY 10017; American National Standards Institute, Inc., 1430 Broadway, New York, NY 10018. |
The referenced publications (or a microfiche of the publications) are available for review at many universities and public libraries throughout the country. These publications may also be examined at the OSHA Technical Data Center, Room N2439, United States Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210, (202) 219-7500 or at any OSHA Regional Office (see telephone directories under United States Government-Labor Department).
Appendix I to § 1910.95 -Definitions
These definitions apply to the following terms as used in paragraphs (c) through (n) of 29 CFR 1910.95 .
Action level-An 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels measured on the A-scale, slow response, or equivalently, a dose of fifty percent.
Audiogram-A chart, graph, or table resulting from an audiometric test showing an individual's hearing threshold levels as a function of frequency.
Audiologist-A professional, specializing in the study and rehabilitation of hearing, who is certified by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association or licensed by a state board of examiners.
Baseline audiogram-The audiogram against which future audiograms are compared.
Criterion sound level-A sound level of 90 decibels.
Decibel (dB)-Unit of measurement of sound level.
Hertz (Hz)-Unit of measurement of frequency, numerically equal to cycles per second.
Medical pathology-A disorder or disease. For purposes of this regulation, a condition or disease affecting the ear, which should be treated by a physician specialist.
Noise dose-The ratio, expressed as a percentage, of (1) the time integral, over a stated time or event, of the 0.6 power of the measured SLOW exponential time-averaged, squared A-weighted sound pressure and (2) the product of the criterion duration (8 hours) and the 0.6 power of the squared sound pressure corresponding to the criterion sound level (90 dB).
Noise dosimeter-An instrument that integrates a function of sound pressure over a period of time in such a manner that it directly indicates a noise dose.
Otolaryngologist-A physician specializing in diagnosis and treatment of disorders of the ear, nose and throat.
Representative exposure-Measurements of an employee's noise dose or 8-hour time-weighted average sound level that the employers deem to be representative of the exposures of other employees in the workplace.
Sound level-Ten times the common logarithm of the ratio of the square of the measured A-weighted sound pressure to the square of the standard reference pressure of 20 micropascals. Unit: decibels (dB). For use with this regulation, SLOW time response, in accordance with ANSI S1.4-1971 (R1976), is required.
Sound level meter-An instrument for the measurement of sound level.
Time-weighted average sound level-That sound level, which if constant over an 8-hour exposure, would result in the same noise dose as is measured.
29 C.F.R. §1910.95