EXAMPLE 1. A claimant receives $160 benefits every 2 weeks. The claimant reports earnings of $100 per week for a 2-week period. Through departmental error, those earnings are not reflected in the benefit payment and claimant receives $160 for that 2-week period. The claimant retains the benefits without informing the department of the error. There are no other facts indicating the claimant did not have the capacity to recognize the error or that the claimant relied in good faith on the department's error. In this case, the claimant is at fault because he or she accepted a payment which he or she knew or should have known was incorrect.
EXAMPLE 2. A claimant applies for benefits and receives notice of an award of a weekly benefit amount of $80. However, the notice prepared by the department is erroneous and the weekly benefit amount should be only $60. The claimant is not at fault in the absence of any showing that he or she should have known of the error. Since no such showing appears here, he claimant is not at fault.
EXAMPLE 3. A claimant reports earnings of $80 per week when in fact the claimant knew or should have known that his or her earnings were $100 per week. The claimant is at fault and is liable for the overpayment.
EXAMPLE 4. The claimant receives and retains benefits from California and from another state for the same week, but does not report the duplication. The claimant is at fault, unless there is a showing that the claimant reasonably misunderstood benefits entitlement, and no such showing appears here. The claimant is at fault and is liable for the overpayment.
EXAMPLE 5. The claimant applies for disability or unemployment benefits and is placed on notice with the first payment that he/she must report either the receipt of any workers' compensation benefits or the making of a claim for workers' compensation because he/she may not receive double payments for the same days. The claimant receives both workers' compensation and disability or unemployment insurance benefits but does not report the duplication. The claimant is at fault and is liable for the overpayment.
EXAMPLE 1. A claimant is overpaid benefits of $31. During the time that he or she was being paid benefits, his or her savings account balance diminished from $500 to $250. The claimant's only income during this period was unemployment insurance. All of the funds spent by him or her during this period were for current expenses. By virtue of having expended benefits and savings, this claimant has changed his or her position in reliance on benefit payments.
EXAMPLE 2. A claimant was overpaid benefits of $104. At the time that the overpayment was being assessed, he or she was fully employed at $7.50 per hour and had more than the amount of the overpayment in his or her checking account. Because this claimant has not changed his or her position due to receipt of benefits, there is no detrimental reliance in this example.
For the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1983, the Table shall be computed by multiplying the average annual low income budget amount as issued by the Employment Development Department for fiscal year July, 1982 - June, 1983 ($16,714) by the change in the Consumer Price Index U. S. City Average for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers for the period May, 1982 - April, 1983. The figure shall be multiplied by the percentages in the following Table:
Persons in Family | Gross Monthly Income |
1 | 40% of average for family of 4 |
2 | 62% of average for family of 4 |
3 | 83% of average for family of 4 |
4 | 100% of average for family of 4 |
5 | 119% of average for family of 4 |
6 | 138% of average for family of 4 |
For each additional person add | 19% of average for family of 4 |
To produce a Family Income Level Table for each fiscal year thereafter, the director shall repeat the process described above, using the estimated low income budget figure for immediately preceding fiscal year and the change in the above-specified Consumer Price Index for the immediately preceding May to April.
EXAMPLE 6. A claimant is married and has two children at home. The average monthly family income for the preceding six months was below the allowable gross monthly income for a family of 4 using the current Family Income Level Table. The claimant has no readily available assets. Recovery of the overpayment will cause extraordinary hardship and the overpayment is waived.
EXAMPLE 7. A claimant is married and has two children at home. The average monthly family income for the preceding six months was in excess of the allowable gross monthly income for a family of 4 using the current Family Income Level Table. The claimant has a home, furnishings, and a car, but no other assets, and no unusual expenses or debts. The overpayment is not waived.
EXAMPLE 8. Assume the same facts as in Example 7, except that the claimant pays $100 a month in outstanding medical bills which total $5,000. Recovery of the overpayment will cause extraordinary hardship and the overpayment is waived.
EXAMPLE 9. The claimant is married and has two children at home. The claimant's family income for the 4-week period immediately preceding the date on which recovery is sought was $12 in excess of the allowable gross monthly income for a family of 4 using the current Family Income Level Table. The claimant has a home, furnishings therein, and a car, but no other assets, and has no unusual expenses or debts. The repayment schedule may provide for a maximum payment of $12 per month.
EXAMPLE 10. The claimant is married but has no children. The claimant's family income for the 4-week period immediately preceding the date on which recovery is sought was below the allowable gross monthly income for a family of 2 using the current Family Income Level Table. Claimant also has stocks valued at $300. The repayment schedule may provide for a minimum payment of $10 per month and a lump sum recovery for the resale value of the stocks, less costs of sale.
EXAMPLE 11. Assume the same facts as in Example 9, except that the claimant pays $40 monthly in outstanding medical bills which total $500. The repayment schedule may provide for a minimum payment of $10 per month.
Cal. Code Regs. Tit. 22, §§ 1375-1
2. Amendment filed 5-19-81; effective thirtieth day thereafter (Register 81, No. 21).
3. Amendment of subsection (d)(2) filed 1-28-82; effective thirtieth day thereafter (Register 82, No. 5).
4. Amendment of subsection (d) filed 1-24-84; effective thirtieth day thereafter (Register 84, No. 4).
Note: Authority cited: Sections 305 and 306, Unemployment Insurance Code. Reference: Sections 1375, 2735, 3751 and 4751, Unemployment Insurance Code.
2. Amendment filed 5-19-81; effective thirtieth day thereafter (Register 81, No. 21).
3. Amendment of subsection (d)(2) filed 1-28-82; effective thirtieth day thereafter (Register 82, No. 5).
4. Amendment of subsection (d) filed 1-24-84; effective thirtieth day thereafter (Register 84, No. 4).