EXAMPLE 1. A truck driver had complained repeatedly to the employer that the assigned truck was defective. The employer did not remedy the defects. The truck's emergency brake was disconnected, the foot brake was inadequate, and the battery was so low that the motor would start only by hand cranking. While the employee was cranking the motor, the truck slipped over the rear wheel block and crashed into a nearby building. The employee returned the truck to the employer's terminal, waited two hours for supervision without success, and left the work.
The employee's leaving was with good cause due to dangerously defective equipment which the employer chose to ignore despite the employee's complaints.
COMMENTS. Under this subdivision, mere inconvenience or extra work due to inadequate equipment is not a justification for leaving. For example, a typist leaves without good cause if the leaving of work is due to preference for an electric rather than a manual typewriter. Similarly, a messenger leaves without good cause if the leaving is because a bicycle rather than a motor scooter is furnished to do the work.
Cal. Code Regs. Tit. 22, §§ 1256-13
Note: Authority cited: Sections 305 and 306, Unemployment Insurance Code. Reference: Section 1256, Unemployment Insurance Code.