Section 3392.1 - Allegation Inquiry and Investigation Findings(a) Upon receipt and review of an allegation inquiry report, investigation report, or approval of direct adverse action, the hiring authority shall render a determination for each allegation for each subject. The findings and their explanations are as follows:(1) NO FINDING: The reporting party failed to disclose promised information to further the investigation; the investigation revealed that another agency was involved and the reporting party has been referred to that agency; the reporting party wishes to withdraw the complaint; the reporting party refuses to cooperate with the investigation; or the reporting party is no longer available for clarification of facts/issues.(2) NOT SUSTAINED: The investigation failed to disclose a preponderance of evidence to prove or disprove the allegation made in the complaint.(3) UNFOUNDED: The investigation conclusively proved that the act(s) alleged did not occur, or the act(s) may have, or in fact, occurred but the individual employee(s) named in the complaint(s) was not involved.(4) EXONERATED: The facts, which provided the basis for the complaint or allegation, did in fact occur; however, the investigation revealed that the actions were justified, lawful, and proper.(5) SUSTAINED: The investigation disclosed a preponderance of evidence to prove the allegation(s) made in the complaint.(b) If the hiring authority finds an allegation inquiry report insufficient to make investigation findings, the hiring authority shall refer the case to OIA for investigation.(c) When a hiring authority sustains misconduct as a result of an allegation inquiry, only corrective action can be imposed unless a request for direct adverse action is approved by OIA.Cal. Code Regs. Tit. 15, § 3392.1
Note: Authority cited: Sections 5058 and 5058.3, Penal Code. Reference: Sections 5054 and 5058.4, Penal Code, Armstrong et al. v. Newsom et al., United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Court Case number 94-cv-02307-CW, Madrid v. Woodford, Special Masters Final Report Re: Department Of Corrections Post Powers Investigations And Employee Discipline; Case No. C90-3094-T.E.H. and Madrid v. Woodford, Order; and Case No. C90-3094-T.E.H. Class Action.
Note: Authority cited: Sections 5058 and 5058.3, Penal Code. Reference: Sections 5054 and 5058.4, Penal Code, Armstrong et al. v. Newsom et al., United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Court Case number 94-cv-02307-CW, Madrid v. Woodford, Special Masters Final Report Re: Department Of Corrections Post Powers Investigations And Employee Discipline; Case No. C90-3094-T.E.H. and Madrid v. Woodford, Order; Case No. C90-3094-T.E.H. Class Action.
1. Certificate of Compliance as to 6-13-2022 order, including renumbering of former section 3392.1 to section 3392.2 and new section 3392.1, transmitted to OAL 9-12-2022 and filed 9-29-2022; amendments effective 9-29-2022 pursuant to Government Code section 11343.4(b)(3) (Register 2022, No. 39).
2. Change without regulatory effect amending subsections (b) and (c) filed 3-16-2023 pursuant to section 100, title 1, California Code of Regulations (Register 2023, No. 11).
3. Change without regulatory effect amending subsection (a)(1) filed 7-1-2024 pursuant to section 100, title 1, California Code of Regulations (Register 2024, No. 27).